Suwayda 2025: chronology of an predictable massacre

This work to of re-establishing the facts hour by hour since the beginning of the aggression against the communities of Suwayda was carried out on the basis of our own experience on the spot, the testimonies of our relatives and members of Suwayda’s civil society (which we refuse to qualify as “Druze” insofar as the community includes Christians, Bedouins and some Muslim families native to the region and non-Bedouins), as well as the rereading of all the Facebook posts of several local media objectively reporting the facts over the period from July 12 to 26, 2025:

  • Al-Raased: ~220 publications
  • Aram News: ~230 publications
  • Suwayda24: ~170 publications
  • Suwayda Media: ~100 publications

To these can be added the publications of the main players in the conflict:

  • Gathering of the Southern Tribes (Tajmua Asha’er al-Janub): 332 publications
  • Legion of the Mountain of Dignity (Liwa Jabal al-Karama – leader: Shakeeb Azzam): 49 publications
  • Movement of the Men of Dignity (Harakat Rijal al-Karama – leader: Yahia al-Hajjar): 30 publications
  • Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari: 15 publications
  • Army of Unitarians (Jaysh al-Muwahidun – leader: Osama al-Safadi): 9 publications
  • Forces of the Sheikh of Dignity (Quwat Sheikh al-Karama – leader: Raafat Baali): 9 publications
  • Suwayda Military Council (Majliss al-Askari fi as-Suwayda – leader: Tareq al-Shufi): 6 publications
  • Madhafe of Dignity (Madhafet al-Karama – leader: Layth al-Balous): 5 publications
  • Gathering of Free Men of the Arab Mountain (Tajmua al-Ahrar Jabal al-Arab – leader: Suleiman Abd al-Baqi): 1 publication

It is important to remember that it all began on the evening of July 11, 2025, with the kidnapping, theft (vehicle, 5 tons of fruit and vegetables, 7 million Syrian pounds, a phone) and the torture of Fadlallah Naeem Dwara, a merchant from al-Kharsa (Suwayda), near the Braq/al-Masmiyeh checkpoint.

It should be noted that this checkpoint controls the junction of the roads between Damascus, Suwayda, and Deraa and has been held since May by members of the Al-Naim tribe of Mteleh who do not officially answer to the orders of the Al-Sharaa regime. Several fighters controlling this checkpoint wore balaclavas and Islamist insignia (shahada and Islamic State flag).

Fadlallah Naeem Dwara was then thrown, shackled, onto the side of a road, from where he was able to reach Route 110 and be picked up by motorists, who took him to the hospital.

It should also be noted that the region between Braq and Mteleh is home to criminal groups that have been committing abuses and crimes against users of Route 110 between Suwayda and Damascus for many years, often in collaboration with the Bashar al-Assad regime. All indications are that these groups, as well as the unidentified armed men controlling the Braq/al-Masmiyeh checkpoint, are involved in the kidnapping of Fadlallah Naeem Dwara.

Saturday 12 July

(13 press publications)

15h to 22h

Fadlallah Naeem Dwara’s relatives responded to the attack by kidnapping two, then eight Bedouins from Suwayda tribal community and from Al-Hasakeh tribes with the help of a faction from Ariqa (bordering Al-Kharsa), demanding the return of Fadlallah Naeem Dwara’s truck in exchange.

The Suwayda electricity company announced the cutting of the high-voltage line supplying the governorate at Al-Kaswa and Sheikh Meskin.

Tensions and exchanges of fire took place in Shahba, in the Bedouin neighborhoods of Shaqrawiya and Mansoura, followed by attempts for mediation by the sheikhs of the different communities involved. A first casualty, Rami Faysal Naeem, was admitted to the Suwayda hospital after being shot in the head. The Southern Tribes Assembly announced a return to calm late in the evening.

Sunday 13 July 

(75 press publications)

10 a.m. to 11 a.m.

Members of the Shanabla tribe of Al-Maqwas (associated with Syrian-Jordanian sheikh and businessman Rakan Al-Khudeir, leader of the Southern Tribes Gathering and notorious drug trafficker) kidnap five residents of Suwayda on the Suwayda-Damascus road.

11 a.m. to 12 p.m.

The intervention of sheikhs from the community (notably Youssef Jarbou’a) and mediation efforts to end the escalation remain unsuccessful, and armed clashes have begun in the district of Al-Maqwas, a predominantly Bedouin neighborhood on the outskirts of the city of Suwayda.

12 p.m.

Internal Security cuts the road between Suwayda and Damascus.

3 p.m. to 5 p.m.

Seven wounded people are treated at the Suwayda hospital after being brought in from Al-Maqwas, while the neighborhood is the scene of heavy weapons clashes (mortars and RPGs) between armed Bedouin groups and Druze factions. Clashes also take place in Al-Kharej.

Statement: Sheikh Hammoud al-Hennawi issues an initial statement calling for reasonable behavior and an end to tensions that are detrimental to social peace.

5 p.m. to 6 p.m.

The Ariqa faction announces its decision to release the Bedouins taken hostage following mediation by the sheikhs.

Six deaths are recorded at this stage by the hospital, while the residents of Al-Maqwas are trapped between the two sides of the conflict: children Yaman Muqlad and Zyad Mazen Dal.

6 p.m.

A seventh death is reported at Suwayda hospital, along with 32 wounded.

Sniper fire is reported in Atil.

The governor of Suwayda, Mustafa Bakur, calls for calm in a statement, along with the residents of Al-Maqwas.

8 p.m.

Tribal groups from outside Suwayda launch an attack from the Suwayda-Izraa road on the villages of At-Tira, Harran, Labin, and Jreen located on the western border of the governorate, while the villages of Mazraa and Sami’ are subjected to mortar fire.

An attack is also reported at the Internal Security checkpoint in El-Al-Araq, Al-Sawara al-Kbira, and Hazm. Clashes continue in the Bedouin neighborhoods of Al-Mashourb, Al-Harubi, and Mansoura.

Three residents of the villages of Um Rwaq and Maf’aleh are killed: Aamer Nassar Nassar, Imran Al-Aqbani, and Basel Najm Ghanem.

9 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari issues a statement denouncing attempts to incite sedition.

A mortar shell hits the home of faction leader Suleiman Abd al-Baqi in Suwayda, injuring four of his men.

Three other people die at the Suwayda hospital: Hamoud Naseeb al-Arbid, 65, Jalal Ghassan Abu Ghazi, 21, and Walid Fouad Al-Ish’oush. Two residents of Al-Majdal are also killed in At-Tireh: Ehsan Ahmed al-Shater and Khaldoun Salman al-Shater.

Monday 14 July 

(75 press publications)

1 a.m. to 2 a.m.

At this point, the governorate is completely under siege, while the Rijal Al-Karami movement liberates the village of At-Tireh. The group issues a statement denouncing the violation of the agreements signed with the government in May, which included a promise to restore security on this same road. It emphasizes the need for the community to ensure its own self-defense.

2 a.m. to 3 a.m.

Press release: Sheikh Youssef Jarbou’a’s mediation results in the release of the Suwayda hostages held by Bedouin tribes in exchange for the payment of a ransom.

The first images showing the abuses in At-Tireh are broadcast.

6 a.m. to 9 a.m.

Tribal groups from Dera’a relaunch their offensive at dawn against the villages of Taara, Al-Dour, Sami’ and Al-Dwira with heavy mortar fire and drones. They also approach the village of Kanaker.

11 a.m. to 4 p.m.

The Israeli air force intervenes in the skies over Suwayda, while the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior announce the deployment of troops and heavy weapons to the borders of the governorate, claiming to be intervening to “end the clashes and restore security.” However, the army is doing nothing to prevent the tribal groups from advancing, taking advantage of their support to move forward along the Bosra al-HarrirTaara and Oum WaladKanaker axes.

Violent clashes are taking place in Al-Mazraa, Al-Thaala, and Kanaker.

Hundreds of displaced persons are fleeing the combat zones, and reception centers have been opened in Salkhad and Shahba.

Videos are beginning to emerge on social media, posted by tribal groups. These videos reveal the involvement of Sheikh **** and foreign fighters.

Statement: Emir Hassan al-Atrash issues a statement declaring that he is in talks with the government and Druze spiritual leaders to find solutions to the conflict.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari also issues a statement rejecting any presence of the government army in the region and calling for international protection.

Tribal groups fired numerous mortar rounds at nine villages and the city of Suwayda, while 200 wounded were reported at the Suwayda hospital. Druze factions announce the death of 22 of their fighters near Al-Thaala and Kanaker, bringing the total number of deaths to 64. Among the fighters is a comrade-in-arms of local revolutionary hero Khaldun Zein ed-Din, Baha Abdullah.

The Druze leadership, along with the Suwayda Medical Corps, call for an end to all violence.

4 p.m. to 7 p.m.

Tribal groups and the government’s army seize Labin, Harran, Al-Dour, Al-Mazraa, and Al-Mjemer. The occupied villages are subjected to systematic destruction and looting of homes.

At this stage, the Suwayda National Hospital has recorded 53 deaths, including women and children, and more than 200 wounded. Al-Hakma Hospital reports that it has received a total of 40 wounded, one of whom has died from his injuries: Asim al-Qontar.

The Israeli air force carried out a strike on the outskirts of Al-Mazraa.

7 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari met with several sheikhs from Mayamas at his home in Qanawat. A drone carried out a strike on the city, causing minor material damage.

Statement: The Druze leadership calls for a ceasefire and the expulsion of the Islamist groups responsible for the attack.

11 p.m.

Four missiles strike the city of Suwayda.

Tuesday 15 July

(84 press publications)

5 a.m.

Attacks resume in the village of Kanaker.

8 a.m. to 10 a.m.

Statement: The Druze leadership declares its acceptance of the governement’s army entering the area and requests that it secure the governorate’s internal military and defense institutions, inviting the government to engage in dialogue and calling on Druze self-defense factions to cease resistance, cooperate with the army, and surrender their weapons.

Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari joins this statement, despite his opposition to the Al-Sharaa government.

In the wake of this, the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior announce their deployment in central Suwayda, as well as the imposition of a curfew until further notice. They call on residents not to allow fighters to use their homes to target government forces.

Photographs are published showing the deliberate burning of the Christian church in Al-Sawara Al-Kabira by Islamist groups and the government army, which stormed the village two days earlier.

10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari issues a new statement, retracting his previous statement, which he says he signed due to international pressure.

The director of Salkhad Hospital, Loui Al-Shufi, announces that the hospital has reached capacity after receiving more than 40 wounded.

11 a.m. to 12 p.m.

The government’s armed forces enter the city of Suwayda accompanied by hundreds of Islamist fighters, who undertake the systematic destruction and looting of the city’s shops and monuments. Under the pretext of disarming the factions, these groups enter residential buildings and begin the systematic massacre of civilians they encounter. Snipers take up positions in empty buildings and shoot at civilians trying to move around the streets, while the city is heavily bombed. Mortars are fired at the town of Atil, north of Suwayda.

12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.

The Ministry of Defense declares its intention to transfer control of Suwayda to the forces of the Ministry of Interior and announces a ceasefire, promising to prosecute the perpetrators of crimes and offenses. Images are broadcast showing a military convoy including heavy weapons heading towards the exit of Suwayda, while a Military Police convoy is deployed in Suwayda.

1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

The commander of the internal security forces for Suwayda, Colonel Ahmed Dalati, and the commander of the internal security forces for Deraa, Colonel Shahir Imran, meet with community leaders in Suwayda to discuss the deployment of internal security forces.

Tribal groups nevertheless continue their war crimes and acts of genocide. Chaos reigns in the city and among the forces present, with social media spreading contradictory messages. Civilians are subjected to humiliation, abuse, and summary executions, while the shabiha of the new regime, Jamil Al-Hassan and Qutayba Yassin, posing as journalists, spread false information mixed with calls for sectarian hatred.

The first images of summary executions of civilians are broadcast, including those of the 13 members of the Al-Radwan family, shot at point-blank range in the living room (madhafeh) of their home, where they believed themselves to be safe: Wessam Fahad Radwan, Ashraf Fahad Radwan, Nasreen Radwan, Omar Muafagh Radwan, Imran Muafagh Radwan, Samer Moazi Radwan, Satea Reza Radwan, Rabee Radwan, Khaldoon Radwan, Khalid Radwan, Essam Radwan, Mamun Sabir Radwan, Majdi Mamun Radwan.

Crowds of civilians are trying to flee Suwayda towards the south.

4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

An Israeli strike targets a light vehicle belonging to the government’s army near the criminal police building, while Islamists have taken over the governorate headquarters and are advancing on the northeast axis toward the Khaldun Zein ed-Din roundabout and the Qanawat road. At the same time, they are advancing on the south-eastern axis towards the national hospital, where dozens of wounded people have gathered, while the response from Druze self-defense factions is strengthening on the north-western axis towards Walgha and the south-western axis towards Kanaker. Outside the city, violent clashes continue around ‘Ira and Al-Mjemer.

Medical sources in Suwayda report that Dr. Faten Hilal was shot dead by a sniper as she was on her way to the National Hospital to help the overworked staff, along with six members of the Qordab family at the Sultan Basha roundabout: Hisham Qordab, Fajr Qordab, Leith Qordab, Imran Qordab, Zaid Qordab, and Rebal Qordab.

5 p.m.

Regime forces and Islamist groups launch a raid on the national hospital compound.

7 p.m. to 8 p.m.

The director of medical teams at the national hospital, Dr. Omar Obaid, calls on the parties to the conflict to respect the hospital’s neutrality and allow it to operate normally.

Sources report the abduction of civilians by Islamist groups and government forces, while medical sources count more than 20 summary executions. The disappearance of a couple and their son is reported: Eman Naseeb, Nasir al-Hadwe, and Adam.

The government’s official armed forces are gradually withdrawing from the city of Suwayda.

10 p.m. to midnight

Images of the destruction of the Christian Church of As-Sawara Al-Kabira are broadcast as the village is occupied by the government’s armed forces.

Several villages in the region, as well as the city of Suwayda, are subjected to intense bombardment and their streets are the scene of intense clashes. The Salkhad hospital in the south of the governorate declares that it is reaching capacity due to the arrival of numerous injured people.

The Rijal al-Karami community self-defense movement has issued a statement holding the regime’s army responsible for the deaths of a large number of its fighters and accusing it of violating the ceasefire agreement signed prior to its entry into the city of Suwayda. It condemns the numerous abuses committed by the army and the Islamist groups accompanying it and reaffirms the right of the Suwayda community to self-defense.

Wednesday 16 July

(57 press publications)

1:30 p.m.

The media announces the death of Sheikh Marhaj Shaheen (80), originally from Al-Thaala, following the release of a video by tribal groups showing him being humiliated and his moustache shaved off.

Videos filmed by Islamists show trucks leaving Suwayda for Deraa loaded with furniture looted from homes in Al-Thaala.

9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

The city of Suwayda, as well as the villages of Rsas and Sahwet Blata, located 10 kilometers south of it, are subjected to intense mortar bombardment from dawn. Other villages are targeted by Grad rocket fire, while tribal groups invade houses near the junction between the Rsas and Kanaker roads (south of Suwayda). Three residents are kidnapped and then executed: Muhammad al-Barbour, Ra’ed al-Barbour, and Amjad al-Barbour.

Entire families are killed in Sami’, Al-Mazraa, and several other villages after their homes are raided by tribal groups claiming to be members of the General Security.

The area surrounding Suwayda Hospital is the scene of clashes and the target of mortar and RPG fire, while a tank advances toward the building and blocks access to ambulances. Snipers from the government’s armed forces take up positions in the hospital bunker and fire on civilians attempting to receive medical care there. At the end of the clashes, hospital staff declare that the hospital is out of service and blocked by heavy weapons, requesting that patients be transferred to other medical facilities in the province.

The execution by a sniper of Dr. Talaat Fawzi Amer, famous for his participation in the Syrian revolution against Bashar al-Assad, is announced. Medical staff confirmed that all the injuries treated at the hospital were the result of gunshots to the head, including women and children. Reports of crimes and summary executions are multiplying, with the city of Suwayda being invaded by tribal groups who are randomly killing residents in front of their homes, breaking into houses, looting them, and setting them on fire.

12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.

Statement: The Rijal al-Karama movement issues a statement paying tribute to its martyred fighters and condemning the aggression by government forces, recalling that the Druze factions have not stopped calling for a ceasefire.

The hospital is heavily bombed, while its staff is trapped inside. Armed men move through the Qalaa and Nahdha neighborhoods, shooting at homes and attacking residents in their homes.

Citizen Abdullah Al-Baeini is executed in front of his family during a raid on his home.

A demonstration in support of Suwayda is organized in Aleppo.

2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

The media announces the death of the girl Tala Hussam Al-Shufi, killed by a sniper shot to the head. Her father, Hussam al-Shufi, is also known for his support of the Syrian revolution against Bashar al-Assad.

The Israeli air force is concentrating its strikes on the area around the village of Kanaker, located 8 kilometers southwest of Suwayda, against locations firing mortars at the city.

Numerous accounts are piling up, testifying to large numbers of residents trapped in their homes, hiding in basements, or summarily executed in several neighborhoods of the city of Suwayda by tribal groups as well as by fighters wearing the uniform of the government’s army. Members of the government’s army broke into the hospital and executed two civilian volunteers and several wounded patients. Summary executions of civilians are also reported in the town of Shahba, located 17 kilometers north of Suwayda, along the road to Damascus. Four people are executed in the village of As-Sawara as-Sughra: Mazen Obaid, Zia’ Obaid, Aseel Kamel Obaid, and Abdullah al-Khatib.

The regime’s armed forces and accompanying tribal groups are moving up the road from Suwayda towards Qanawat, the home of Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari, and violent clashes are taking place at the National Museum.

A truck loaded with looted furniture is hit by Israeli air strikes as it prepares to leave Suwayda for Deraa.

The governorate remains under siege, with no way out, no electricity, no ADSL, and no telephone lines, while the mobile network is extremely unstable.

Many civilians are heading toward the Jordanian border to escape the fighting and abuses.

4 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Israeli strikes hit the presidential palace and the Ministry of Defense in Damascus. This unnecessary show of force only serves to turn the entire Syrian population against the Suwayda community.

The death toll stands at more than 300 civilians and combatants.

Mass mobilization of Druze combatants to liberate the city of Suwayda from tribal groups.

A group of protesters gathers in front of the Parliament building in Damascus to protest against the military operation in Suwayda.

6 p.m.

The town of Al-Kafr, located 11 kilometers southeast of Suwayda, is targeted by bombing.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari declares that no agreement has been reached with the government, demands the unconditional withdrawal of all armed forces that have invaded the region, and calls for the continued armed defense of the community.

The villages west of Suwayda continue to be systematically looted and their property transferred by tribal groups to Deraa.

Thousands of displaced persons are heading south, while all roads leading out of the Suwayda governorate remain blocked. The national hospital is virtually out of service and corpses are piling up in the streets, while large areas are without electricity and suffering from water shortages. Communication networks are virtually non-existent.

9 p.m.

The US Secretary of State calls on the Syrian government to withdraw its armed forces from Suwayda. Once again, this does not apply to tribal groups that support the government’s army.

Statement: The Rijal al-Karami movement issues a statement declaring that it will not accept any agreement that does not include the total withdrawal of all armed forces committing war crimes in the governorate, and that it will fight to the last combatant until the invaders withdraw from the towns and villages they have occupied.

11 p.m. to midnight

The Ministry of Defense announces the start of the withdrawal of its armed forces. This decision still does not apply to tribal groups that remain in many neighborhoods, particularly in Al-Khudher, Nazla al-Auj, near the Cultural Center, near the al-Omran and al-Zinabqa roundabouts, etc. The national hospital also remains under siege.

Thrusday 17 July

(53 press publications)

Midnight to 1 a.m.

A video confirms the summary execution of a group of civilians near Teshrin Square (recently renamed “Martyr Khaldoun Zein Eddin Square” in honor of a Druze defector from the army who formed a Free Syrian Army battalion against Bashar al-Assad in 2012).

A group of Islamist fighters is captured in Suwayda, including two foreign fighters.

Numerous eyewitness accounts confirm the presence of many bodies in the streets of Suwayda.

The regime’s armed forces begin to withdraw, while tribal groups remain in the city of Suwayda.

6 a.m. to 11 a.m.

After the regime’s armed forces withdrew, Druze factions gradually regained control of the city and discovered the extent of the destruction and crimes committed. Numerous bodies littered the streets of the city and filled the rooms and corridors of the hospital. A large number of businesses were looted, destroyed, and burned.

It takes four hours to collect the bodies from the streets.

11 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari issues a new statement calling for support for the families of victims and medical teams, and for the crimes to be documented. He also calls for the opening of a crossing point with Jordan.

Images of the massacres begin to be broadcast.

1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

The national hospital reports receiving 226 bodies, some of which are awaiting identification, and estimates that the total number of victims is likely to exceed 500, most of whom are civilians.

The bodies of 12 members of the same family, the Al-Muz’har family, are found in their apartment in the al-Koum neighborhood, including eight women and girls and an elderly disabled man.

Several bodies belonging to members of the Saraya family are discovered in Teshrin Square.

In several locations throughout the city, bodies of civilians are found in their vehicles riddled with bullets.

Statement: Sheikh Youssef Jarbou’a issued a statement denouncing a massacre organized under the guise of a “simple security operation,” contrary to the precepts of Islam, for which the Syrian state and the countries that support it bear full responsibility. He called on humanitarian organizations and international institutions to investigate and document the crimes.

False information and threats are being spread from phones stolen from the victims, and an intense disinformation campaign is being launched on social media and by mainstream media outlets, including Al-Jazeera, Al-Arabi, Al-Akhbariya, and SyriaTV. The Druze are accused of massacring hundreds of Bedouins, presenting the Druze victims as Bedouins and stirring up a wave of resentment and sectarian hatred on social media and across the country.

Most fake news stories are refuted by the website Verify.sy.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari issues a statement rejecting all violence and calling for the Bedouin population not to be persecuted.

An armed group attacks the village of Walgha.

5 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Videos are circulating showing that Bedouin populations are being welcomed and sheltered in several public buildings in the region, notably in Shahba, Reemt al-Lohof, and Al-Kafr. Rumors are beginning to circulate on social media that these populations are being held hostage.

Friday 18 July

(51 press publications)

1 a.m. to 6 a.m.

Videos show houses on fire in Al-Mazraa.

A wave of fake news reports announced the invasion of Suwayda by Bedouin tribes, but the entry of armed groups has only been confirmed in Thakir and Walgha. False videos alleging crimes committed by Druze factions are circulating on the internet, some of which originate from massacres committed by Israel in Gaza.

Despite the rumors, Druze factions remain in control of most of the province, with the exception of some 20 towns and villages in the west and north.

8 a.m.

At this stage, thousands of Islamist militants across the country are declaring their intention to wage jihad against the Druze, while a number of villages in the west of the governorate remain occupied by the groups responsible for the crimes committed over the past four days.

The regime refuses to send its army back to Suwayda, while Turkey and Saudi Arabia declare their support for it.

12 p.m. to 2 p.m.

Statement: Father Tony Petros, representative of the Roman Catholic Church in Suwayda, calls for reason and peaceful coexistence.

The Druze factions announce the liberation of Suwayda, then Walgha, and the escape of the Islamists to Al-Mazraa.

3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Press release: The Archdiocese of the Roman Orthodox Church of Bosra Hauran and Jabal Arab, represented by Archpriest Antonius Saad, calls for the reopening of roads and an end to the siege that is depriving 300,000 households of water, electricity, medicine, and food.

A new video shows the humiliation of a Red Crescent employee by a member of the tribal groups, who shaves his moustache in front of the camera, as well as the summary execution of medical staff at the national hospital.

5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Nearly 80,000 families have been displaced from Suwayda by the violence towards the south of the province and the Jordanian border, while a thousand Bedouin families have been displaced to Deraa.

The hospitals in Suwayda are out of service.

An armed convoy of tribal groups is positioned near Barek coming from the desert, while hundreds of displaced people have taken refuge there in recent hours. They are unable to advance and are content to film the burning of houses left empty by their owners.

The military commander of Rijal al-Karama, Sheikh Abu Dyab, has released a video showing his men liberating Walgha.

6 p.m. to 8 p.m.

The village of Sahwet Blata announces the death of 19 of its residents, killed in a massacre committed while the armed forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior were occupying the town. Most of the victims belong to the Al-Bani and Salah families.

The media outlet Al-Raased disputes the Civil Defense’s statement claiming that their employee, who had been missing since Wednesday, July 16, at 6 p.m. at the Al-Omran roundabout, had been kidnapped by Druze factions. It points out that the area was under the control of the government’s armed forces at the time and until late into the night.

10 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Druze factions announce the liberation of the village of ‘Ira, Al-Thaala, and Kafr al-Lohof, where many houses have been looted and burned.

Israel carries out airstrikes on armed groups remaining in the west of the province.

A video is released showing the execution by defenestration of three young men in Suwayda, forced to jump from a balcony by Islamists.

Saturday 19 July

(60 press publications)

1 a.m. to 6 a.m.

The Ministry of the Interior announces a ban on all vehicles and weapons entering Suwayda until further notice and calls on the Bedouin tribal command to withdraw their fighters from Suwayda and surrender their heavy weapons.

The White House envoy announces a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Syria, also signed by Turkey, Jordan, and their neighbors. The Jordanian army deploys on the Syrian border.

Factions continue to respond to attacks by tribal groups in the province.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari confirms the deployment of government internal security forces around the province to prevent the entry of armed groups, prohibits anyone from entering border villages for 48 hours to avoid any initiative that could jeopardize the ceasefire, guarantees protection for Bedouin populations wishing to leave the province, declares the opening of a humanitarian passage to Bosra al-Harir (Deraa) and calls on civil society and armed factions to show responsibility and coordination.

11 a.m. to 2 p.m.

Statement: The Rijal al-Karama movement declares that “government-backed terrorists” continue to attack the province despite the ceasefire, continuing their criminal actions against the civilian population.

2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Tribal groups continue to carry out attacks on several roads leading to Suwayda, in violation of the ceasefire agreements. A video is circulating showing these groups rejecting the ceasefire agreement.

The bodies of tribal fighters found in the streets are carrying military ID cards proving their affiliation with the Ministry of Defense.

The bodies of around 20 members of Mazhar family, including women and children, are discovered in their home in Suwayda.

Statement: The Archbishop of the Roman Orthodox Church of Bosra Hauran sends a message to the international community calling for immediate intervention to put an end to the barbaric massacres targeting young people and the elderly alike.

5 p.m. to 7 p.m.

The medical staff at Suwayda National Hospital declare that the healthcare system has collapsed and that it is impossible to remove the bodies stored within the hospital grounds, as well as reporting the deaths of patients due to the inability to provide them with adequate treatment.

Druze factions liberate the village of Al-Majdal.

7 p.m. to 9 p.m.

Factions continue to clash with disparate armed groups in certain neighborhoods of Suwayda.

Armed groups attack the towns of Ariqa from Dama, Kafr al-Lohof and Um Zeitun using mortars, heavy weapons and drones, while many residents are still there. The town of Shahba is also under attack.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari confirms that the armed action of the Druze factions has been in response to the imperative of self-defense from the outset and that it is the adversary who is not respecting the ceasefire agreement, with armed gangs continuing to commit crimes against humanity. He calls on the countries that signed the ceasefire to take responsibility and protect the Druze community.

9 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Press release: The Southern Clans Assembly (Bedouins), led by Sheikh Nawaf al-Bashir, declares that reports of the beheading of Bedouin children are false, calls for the total and immediate withdrawal of all Bedouin fighters, reaffirms peaceful coexistence with the Druze, and calls for reason and dialogue.

Statement: The Patriarch of the Roman Orthodox Church of Antioch and the Levant calls for an end to the massacres that are jeopardizing coexistence between communities.

A video is circulating showing “journalists” participating in the destruction of Druze religious symbols inside private homes.

Sky News reports testify to the systematic looting of homes by Islamist groups and the massive transfer of stolen goods to the province of Deraa.

Tribal groups attack Shahba after entering Um Zeitun.

Dimanche 20 Juillet

(52 publications de presse)

10h à 11h

Les factions druzes continuent de résister aux attaques des groupes tribaux au Nord de Shahba et Ariqa, tandis que le pillage et l’incendie des maisons se poursuit dans les villages occupés par les forces armées du régime.

Une vidéo atteste de la mise à l’abris des familles bédouines au centre d’accueil temporaire de Shahba.

12h à 14h

Des vidéos montrant les familles bédouines accueillies et prises en charge dans des centres d’accueil sont diffusées par la communauté druze pour démentir les rumeurs selon lesquelles ces familles seraient prises en otages et maltraitées.

Un premier convoi humanitaire du Croissant Rouge entre à Suwayda.

Communiqué : le sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari exige la fin des actions armées et le retrait de toute les forces armées affiliées au régime, accueille l’entrée de l’aide humanitaire dans la province et appelle à la fin immédiate des attaques haineuses contre la communauté, ainsi que les campagnes médiatiques mensongères visant à attiser la haine. Il demande aussi le rétablissement des lignes électriques et des communications et la libération des prisonniers et otage, qui doivent être livrés à 18h sur la place du village de Um Zeitun.

14h à 17h

Des images témoignent de la destruction totale des hangars de stockage du Croissant Rouge à Suwayda.

Communiqué : L’ONU établit une liste des besoins urgents pour Suwayda, à savoir l’ouverture d’un passage sécurisé pour les civils, l’entrée d’aide médicale, d’eau et de nourriture ainsi que l’accès sécurisé et la protection des travailleurs humanitaires.

Publication d’une liste de 25 résidents de Suwayda pris en charge à l’hôpital de Deraa.

17h à 22h

Les factions annoncent la libération complète de Um Zeitun, tandis que Ariqa continue de résister aux attaques des groupes tribaux. Des échanges de tirs ont lieu à Reemat Hazm.

17 femmes de Suwayda sont rappatriées saines et sauves vers Jaramana depuis Deraa.

Des images témoignent des nombreuses violations, destructions et pillages d’habitations commis par les groupes tribaux et les forces gouvernementales dans les villages de Kanaker et Mazraa.

22h à minuit

Les sources médicales annoncent que plus de 600 corps ont été amenés à l’hôpital national depuis le début des massacres, indiquant que cela ne prend pas en compte les corps emmenés aux hôpitaux de Salkhad, Shahba et Sali, ainsi que les corps enterrés sans avoir été emmenés à l’hôpital et les nombreux corps toujours parsemés dans les rues.

Monday 21 July

(33 press publications)

11 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Druze factions continue to resist attacks by tribal groups in Shahba and Um Zeitun, which are making extensive use of drones. This is the thirteenth time that tribal groups have violated the ceasefire agreement.

Druze factions manage to stop attacks on the village of Ariqa from the three axes of Dama, Najran, and Harran.

The US special envoy declares that the Syrian regime must be held accountable.

1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

The transfer of bodies from the Suwayda National Hospital for burial has begun with the help of the Red Crescent. All bodies have been photographed in advance in accordance with legal procedures.

A list of 25 patients from Suwayda being treated at Al-Razi Hospital in Damascus is made public to reassure their relatives.

3 p.m. to 7 p.m.

New mortar fire hits the town of Ariqa.

Christian churches in the region open their doors to serve as emergency medical centers and provide vehicles to serve as ambulances.

Many volunteers participate in cleaning up the Suwayda National Hospital.

The Al-Mazraa hospital announces that it is once again operational.

The Suwayda Bar Association announces its collective resignation in protest against the denial of terrorist crimes and massacres committed in the province.

Students from Suwayda residing in other governorates are being threatened on social media by Islamists, who are publishing their photographs and addresses.

Armed men attack the village of Hayat.

7 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Press release: The Rijal al-Karama movement disputes the false information spread by media outlets complicit in the massacres, claiming that Laith al-Balous is their leader, pointing out that he has been leading his own movement since 2016. It points out that in the face of the aggression against the community, all components of the mountain form a united bloc.

Evidence of a new massacre of civilians by the forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior is emerging: engineer Samir Hussein Hamidan was found murdered in his home in his wheelchair, along with two members of his family.

A group of lawyers is preparing a legal case establishing the responsibility of the Director of Security for Suwayda, Colonel Ahmed Haytham Dalati, and the Director of Security for Deraa, Colonel Shahir Jabbar Imran, in the commission of war crimes.

8 p.m. to 9 p.m.

Tribal groups continue their attacks on the village of Um Zeitun and the town of Shahba, targeting wheat and flour reserves in a clear attempt to facilitate the siege imposed by the regime. The youth of Majadil put up fierce resistance to the tribal groups and call for reinforcements.

A video taken from CCTV footage in a shop in Suwayda confirms that members of the government armed forces played an active role in the massacres of civilians on July 15 and 16: a sheikh is shot dead at point-blank range in the street by men wearing General Security uniforms while walking unarmed in the street. Other videos show raids on private homes and violent attacks on residents.

There are also increasing reports of summary executions, implicating both tribal groups and government forces.

10 p.m. to midnight

As calm seems to be returning, more than twenty villages have been completely destroyed and burned down.

The Rijal al-Karama movement has announced the death of 46 of its fighters since the attacks began.

A first convoy of tanker trucks carrying fuel and gasoline entered Suwayda from Bosra al-Sham toward the town of Al-Qurayya.

Tuesday 22 July

(41 press publications)

9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

The population of more than 30 villages in Suwayda has been evacuated and displaced due to attacks by government forces and their tribal auxiliaries.

Employees of the Suwayda electricity company attempting to restore power to lines near Kanakr warn of the presence of snipers. The company reports that it has lost numerous vehicles and seven of its best employees in the massacres.

Filmed testimonies from victims of the attacks are multiplying, while a new surveillance video shows members of government forces engaging in the destruction and looting of businesses during their temporary occupation of Suwayda on July 15 and 16.

12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

Statement: Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari calls for restrictions on the sharing of sectarian and provocative publications and speeches, while reminding people that the Bedouins are part of the community, should not be persecuted, and must be protected.

Videos and photographs show the destruction of property and homes in the village of Najran.

5 p.m. to 6 p.m.

The effects of the 10-day siege of the province by government forces are beginning to seriously impact the population, which is lacking water due to a total power outage preventing pumps from operating to retrieve water from wells. At the same time, numerous fires are mobilizing tanker trucks to enable firefighters to extinguish the blazes.

9 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Press release: The archbishop of the Roman Orthodox Church of Bosra Hauran and the Arab Mountain denounces false reports claiming that Christians are being expelled from the province and reiterates that Christians are defending their land and heritage while providing protection and spiritual and community support to the population.

A new video has been released showing the summary execution of Al-Thaala resident Mounir Al-Rajma by members of the government forces when he declared himself to be Syrian after they asked him if he was Druze.

LEGENDE:

  • Green – Area under regime’s control before 22 of July.
  • Brown – Mountain “Jabal al-Arab”
  • Red dots – Towns under control of the regime (30 of them entirely destroyed)
  • Pink dots – Towns attacked but not occupied.
  • Green dots – Main cities in Deraa from which the tribes departed.

The Palestinian camp of Yarmouk, a deep Syrian wound

The history of the Yarmouk camp is a microcosm of the region’s history since the beginning of the Assad clan’s dictatorship, which can be described as national socialist. It provides a snapshot of the power relations and political loyalties that have led to the violent fracturing of Syrian and Palestinian societies since the mid-1950s. Yarmouk has also been a microcosm of the uprising and civil war that have ravaged Syria since 2011. Here is a comprehensive review of the chronology of the last fourteen years…

Non-exhaustive presentation of the camp

The Yarmouk refugee camp was established in 1957 on the outskirts of Damascus, covering an area of 2.11 square kilometers bordered to the north by Al-Midan district (Al-Qa’a and Al-Zahera neighborhoods), to the west by Al-Qadam district (Qadam Sharqi and Jouret Shreibati neighborhoods), to the east by Tadamon, and to the south by Yalda, Taqaddom, and Al-Hajar al-Aswad. Its residents fled Palestine in 1948, and some of them passed through Lebanon or Jordan before reaching Syria. The camp gradually expanded eastward after 1967, welcoming refugees from the Golan Heights (including Druze—25%, Turkmen, and Alawites—3%), most of whom settled in the neighboring district of Tadamon. Strictly speaking, the Yarmouk camp initially referred to the area bounded by the 30th Street to the west and Yarmouk Street to the east, then the entire area extending to Palestine Street (see map). In some articles and reports, the camp is incorrectly divided into two separate camps, “Yarmouk camp” and “Palestine camp,” but this division does not correspond to any administrative reality. Similarly, the districts of Al-Hajar al-Aswad and Taqaddom are sometimes included in the name “Yarmouk camp” because some of their residents were also refugees from Palestine.

In 2011, Yarmouk was the largest Palestinian refugee camp among the 12 camps in Syria. At the beginning of the uprising, Yarmouk had 351,500 Syrian residents and 171,880 Palestinian refugees (44,279 families). UNRWA administered 23 facilities there, including 16 schools, three medical centers, a Youth Cultural Center, an Educational Development Center, and two Community Centers [1]. In addition to the schools run by UNRWA, there were seven public schools. There were also 11 mosques in Yarmouk, as the population was almost exclusively Sunni Muslim.

The administrative management of the camp was entrusted to a municipality affiliated with the Ba’ath Party and Palestinian factions loyal to it, led by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command (PFLP-GC). The main Palestinian factions present and active in Yarmouk at the start of the uprising were loyal to Bashar al-Assad’s regime:

  • Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command (PFLP-GC), a splinter group of the PFLP founded in 1968, which left the PLO in 1974. Led by Ahmad Jibril, Talal Naji, and Anwar Raja;
  • Palestine Liberation Army (PLA – Jaysh al-Tahrir al-Falastini), founded by the PLO in 1964, then subservient to the Syrian Ba’ath Party and expelled from the PLO in 1973. Led by Akram Muhammad al-Salti;
  • Fatah al-Intifada (translated as “The Fatah Uprising”), a splinter group of Fatah founded in 1983 and expelled from the PLO the same year. Led by Saïd al-Mouragha “Abu Mussa” until 2013, then Ziad al-Saghir “Abu Hazim”;
  • As-Sa’iqa (translated as “lightning strike”), the Palestinian branch of the Syrian Ba’ath Party founded in 1966. Led by Mohammed Qeis.
  • Harakat Falasteen Hurra (translated as “Free Palestine Movement”), founded in 2003 and led by Yasser Qashlak and Saed Abd Al-Aal.

However, they did not represent the majority of Palestinians in Yarmouk and owed their existence solely to their loyalty to the regime, as other Palestinian movements were banned. Hamas, meanwhile, had enjoyed a presence in Syria since 1999 that was both largely symbolic, due to its membership in the “Axis of Resistance,” and closely controlled, due to its historical affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood, which had been violently persecuted by the regime since the 1980s.

Map 1: Location of Yarmouk regarding Damascus (green square = Map 2)

Map 2: Neighborhoods and districts located around Yarmouk.

Map 3: Infrastructure of the Yarmouk camp.

Before 2011: The Premises.

The Palestinian presence in Syria predates the Assad dictatorship. The influx of refugees in 1948 occurred under the presidency of Shukri Al-Quwatli, two years after Syria had gained its independence. At that time, there were 85,000 Palestinian refugees on Syrian territory, but several successive waves would occur in 1967 from the Golan Heights following the Six-Day War, in 1970 from Jordan following the events of Black September, and in 1982 from Lebanon due to the Lebanese civil war. In 2011, there were 585,610 Palestinian refugees in Syria.

Initially involved with the Palestinians in the Six-Day War and at the beginning of the 1970 crisis (Black September), Syria quickly betrayed their cause under Hafez al-Assad. Its participation in the Yom Kippur offensive in 1973 was aimed more at recovering the Golan Heights lost in 1967 than at defending the Palestinian cause. And as in 1967 and 1970, the Syrian armed forces were defeated, killing hundreds of Palestinian fighters from the Palestine Liberation Army, who were used to serve the interests of the dictatorship. The Golan Heights were left to Israel as part of the disengagement agreements signed between the two countries in 1974.

On January 20, 1976, Syria’s Palestinian proxies, the Palestine Liberation Army and As-Sa’iqa, massacred more than 500 Christian civilians in Damour, bringing shame on the Palestinian resistance, then embodied by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and prompting Christian militias to call on Syria for help. A little over four months later, Assad sent his army into Lebanon in an incomprehensible strategy aimed at supporting the Christian Phalangists against the “Palestinian progressives” of the PLO led by Yasser Arafat and the Lebanese National Movement led by Druze leader Kamal Jumblatt, thereby claiming to prevent Israeli intervention in Lebanon. Immediately after entering Lebanese territory, and after being stopped by the PLO in the Chouf, the Syrian army besieged the Palestinian camp of Tel al-Zaatar with the help of 3,000 Christian Phalangists. After a two-month siege, the Palestinian resistance surrendered and Assad allowed the Christian (fascist) militias to enter the camp on August 12, 1976. The militias proceeded to loot and burn homes, as well as rape and systematically massacre Palestinian civilians, executing more than 1,500 camp residents in one of the largest massacres of Palestinians since the Nakba.

From then until its withdrawal from Lebanon in April 2005, the Syrian army and the Assad regime would determine the fate of Lebanon, but also of the Palestinians in Lebanon and Syria. Following the Israeli intervention in Lebanon in 1982, the Syrian regime first allowed Iran to create, train, and arm Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad, using its territory as a bridge between Iraq and Lebanon, before using Iranian militias as proxies in its bloody war against all Syrians from 2011 onwards, whether they were progressives or Islamists. At the same time, the PLO was expelled from Lebanon, marking the end of political freedom for Palestinians in Lebanon, whose situation became aligned with that of Palestinians in Syria. Treated as eternal foreigners and deprived of their civil rights, they were condemned to neutrality and economic dependence, while being dispossessed of their struggle for the liberation of Palestine, which was taken over by the Syrian state, the Iranian state, and their proxies, with Syria itself soon becoming Iran’s proxy, after having been that of Soviet Russia.

Now that we have set the context, let us turn to the recent history of Yarmouk.

2011–2012: Turmoil. Pro-Assad militias and the regime’s first bombs.

When the uprising broke out in March 2011, the residents of Yarmouk and its political factions initially maintained the position of neutrality that had been imposed on them for nearly 30 years. After an initial strike—which was violently suppressed—to protest the bombing of the Palestinian refugee camp in Dera’a in April, tensions gradually increased between June 2011 and July 2012.

On the occasion of the commemoration of the Nakba and the Naksa, the regime organized two demonstrations on the Golan border on May 15 and June 5, 2011, through the PFLP-GC, during which 26 young Palestinians from Yarmouk were killed by the Israeli army while trying to cross the security barriers. During the funerals held in Yarmouk on June 6, Assad was accused by Yarmouk residents of trying to divert attention from his crimes against Syrians, as well as from the controversial statements made by his cousin and key regime businessman Rami Makhlouf, who had just claimed that “the security of the Syrian regime was one with that of Israel.” The PFLP-GC, for its part, was held responsible for the tragic events that occurred on the Golan border, and in particular for sending the demonstrators into a trap after galvanizing and manipulating them to serve the regime’s false pro-Palestinian propaganda. The regime claimed that attacking it was tantamount to attacking the “Axis of Resistance” and serving the interests of American imperialism and Zionism. Consequently, the Syrian rebellion was equated with a Zionist conspiracy, and Syrian protesters and rebels were portrayed as agents of Western imperialism. Unfortunately, a large part of the Palestinian solidarity movement and the Western Left fell for this specious argument and continue to this day to support the Assad regime and its allies [1]. In any case, the Palestinians of Yarmouk were not deceived, and the funeral, which brought together 30,000 people, turned into a demonstration and surrounded the PFLP-GC headquarters “Al-Khalsa” located on the southern edge of Yarmouk. The guards opened fire, killing two protesters: Rami Siyam (14) and Jamal Ghutan. Hundreds of protesters then stormed the building and set it on fire, killing two members of the PFLP-GC before being repelled by regime forces and PFLP-GC reinforcements.

In August 2011, the regime bombed the Al-Ramel Palestinian refugee camp on the outskirts of Latakia, accusing its residents of supporting “terrorism” due to the strong anti-Assad activity in the camp. More than half of its 10,000 residents were forced to flee the camp by regime forces and their shabiha, who proceeded to loot their homes. In the wake of this, Yarmouk organized its first demonstration in solidarity with Al-Ramel on August 17, 2011, bringing together around 300 people. During the summer, nearly 70,000 displaced persons from various cities targeted by the regime were welcomed en masse into the mosques, schools, and public spaces of Yarmouk.

During 2012, demonstrations and strikes multiplied, echoing the main slogans of the Syrian revolution, while the army opened fire on the crowd and broke the locks of striking businesses to force them to resume their activities. The regime’s security services began to express concern about these protest movements, urging community leaders to silence them.

It should be noted that before the summer of 2012, Yasser Qashlak, a Palestinian millionaire loyal to the regime and founder and leader of the Free Palestine Movement, formed the “Al-Aqsa Shield Forces ” (Quwaat Der’a Al-Aqsa), a group of mercenaries tasked with deterring the opposition from gathering, in particular by meeting at the exits of mosques and staging pro-regime demonstrations. At the end of the summer, Qashlak also financed the arming of 1,100 members of the armed wing of the PFLP-GC, the Jibril Jihad Brigades (Kataeb Jihad Jibril), 500 of whom went on to form the Popular Committees (Al-Lijan al-Sha’biyah), militias set up in Yarmouk and in various districts of the Damascus region to prevent the infiltration of Sunni rebel groups and thus counter the predictable offensive of the Free Syrian Army[2].

On July 13, 2012, Yarmouk was the starting point for a demonstration of several thousand people heading to the neighboring district of Tadamon to protest against its bombing, but also against the massacre of more than 150 civilians in Tremseh (Hama) by Assad’s shabiha and the death of Palestinian recruits in the war waged by the regime against its people. Once again, the army opened fire on the demonstration and killed 10 protesters.

The next day, the funeral, attended by 50,000 people, led to the encirclement of Yarmouk by armored vehicles, and the foreign minister threatened the Palestinian refugees, declaring that as guests they were subject to a duty of neutrality. This desire for neutrality was widely shared by residents and all Palestinian factions, who knew what dramatic consequences opening a new front with the regime in Yarmouk could bring.

[1] Read our publication “Western leftist comrades, you failed your Levantine fellows,” available at https://interstices-fajawat.org/western-leftist-comrades-you-failed-your-arab-fellows/ 

[2] Tom Rollins, Palestinian-Syrian Militarization in Yarmouk, Atlantic Council, July 19, 2017, available at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/palestinian-syrian-militarization-in-yarmouk/ 

2012–2013: The Explosion. The armed rebellion takes control of Yarmouk.

In July 2012, the Free Syrian Army launched its “Damascus Volcano” offensive to liberate the capital. On July 15, the police station at the entrance of Yarmouk was attacked and set on fire, prompting an air strike by the regime and the first strikes on the camp on July 17, killing nine people. Three days later, the FSA withdrew and the regime’s army regained control of all the areas bordering the camp (Al-Hajar al-Aswad, Tadamon, Qadam), forcing many of its inhabitants to take refuge in Yarmouk in addition to the thousands of displaced persons already there.

During the summer, the Yarmouk camp took in thousands more displaced persons, while the regime continued its massive bombardment of Syrian cities in response to the Free Syrian Army rebellion. As a result of this massive influx of displaced persons, the population reached nearly 900,000, three times more than before the uprising. On August 2, 2012, a regime strike killed 21 people in what became known as the “Ja’ouneh Street massacre.” Yarmouk then entered the civil war for the first time, seeing the spread of a “call to protect the Palestinian camps” during the fall, followed by the establishment of Palestinian armed factions opposed to the regime: Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis (affiliated with Hamas and led by Abu Ahmed Mushir), Liwa al-Asifa, Ababil Falastin, Liwa Al-‘Ahda Al-‘Umariya…

Map No. 3: Yarmouk – Situation after the FSA offensive, late 2012.

Hamas, which had supported the protests against the regime, was now offering its expertise to the rebels of the Free Syrian Army and Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis without publicly admitting it. This dangerous choice was motivated by the rise to power of Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood—their patrons and sponsors—in Egypt, but it would very quickly lead to retaliation by the Syrian regime with the arrest and torture of Mamoun al-Jaloudi, commander-in-chief and bodyguard of Hamas Political Bureau Chief Khaled Meshaal, followed by the expulsion of Meshaal and other Hamas leaders from Damascus to Qatar, Cairo, and Gaza. [1] [2] It was also during this period that Jabhat al-Nusra began operating in the district alongside the FSA.

While the regime continued its daily bombardments since the summer, the escalation reached a breaking point in December when Palestinian militias loyal to the regime began to establish checkpoints around Yarmouk and to confront the Free Syrian Army militarily in al-Hajar al-Aswad and Yalda, where the latter had now established itself. It should be noted that the PFLP-GC had so far only used its weapons to intimidate and persecute camp residents, without ever confronting the armed opposition.

Starting on December 12, 2012, the regime initially banned trucks carrying materials from entering the camp. The next day, a strike targeted Al-Bassel Hospital, and then, on December 16, 2012, another air strike targeted the Abd Al-Qader Al-Hussaini mosque and the adjacent school, which were sheltering several hundred refugees from neighboring neighborhoods, killing 200 people in what was called the “MiG massacre” or “Abdul Qader Al-Hussaini massacre.” [3]

The very next day, hundreds of Free Syrian Army and Jabhat al-Nusra fighters took possession of Yarmouk, pushing the PFLP-GC and its allies to the northern end of the camp and declaring it a “liberated zone.” The regime then bombarded the camp heavily, forcing 80% of its residents, both Palestinians and internally displaced persons, to flee Yarmouk to Qudseya and Sehnaya. [4] The factions affiliated with the FSA at the time were Suqur Al-Joulan, Ababil Hawran, Jund Allah, Saraya al-Beyt, Ahfad Aisha, Abu Al-Harith Joulani, Imam Thahabi, Shuhada Al-Nour, and others.

The Suqur al-Joulan and Ababil Hauran factions began looting the homes of residents who refused to leave Yarmouk while squatting with their families in empty homes, creating tensions between residents and the factions present, while Jabhat al-Nusra gradually established Islamic law and persecuted Palestinian activists.

[1] Mohanad Hage Ali, Kill List, Carnegie Middle East Center, 14 mai 2018, accessible à https://carnegieendowment.org/middle-east/diwan/2018/05/kill-list?lang=en

[2] Mamoon Alabbasi, How did Hamas’s military expertise end up with Syria’s rebels?, Middle East Eye, 23 mai 2015, accessible à https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/how-did-hamass-military-expertise-end-syrias-rebels

[3] Action Group For Palestinians in Syria, 9 Years On, Palestinians of Syria Remember Tragic ‘Mig Massacre’ in Yarmouk Camp, 16 décembre 2022, accessible à https://www.actionpal.org.uk/en/post/13709/articles/9-years-on-palestinians-of-syria-remember-tragic-mig-massacre-in-yarmouk-camp

[4] Al-Arabiya, (ARABE) The Military Council of the Free Army storms the Yarmouk camp, 17 Décembre 2012, accessible àhttps://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/12/17/255640

Map No. 5: Yarmouk – Areas of influence in mid-2013

Year 1 of the siege

Map No. 6: Yarmouk – Areas of influence in mid-2014

Year 2 of the siege

2015–2016: The Overwhelming Force. Takfiris rush into Yarmouk

On January 15, 2015, activists launched an appeal for help “Save the Palestinians of Syria,” demanding that the PLO, the UN, and the Red Crescent assume their responsibilities and intervene to end the 546-day siege imposed on the residents of Yarmouk, or at the very least secure the opening of a humanitarian corridor allowing civilians who wish to do so to leave the various camps besieged by the regime. [1] [2] At the same time, new skirmishes between the PFLP-GC and Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis between Palestine Street and Al-Rijeh Square once again led to the suspension of humanitarian aid, with civilians regularly being targeted by snipers. [3] [4]

On January 19, seven brigades affiliated with the FSA (Jaysh al-Islam, Ajnad al-Sham, Ahrar al-Sham, Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis, Quwaat al-Islah, Al-Hahy’a Al-Shara’iya Fiy Janub Dimashq, Muqatilu Al-Hajar Al-Aswad, etc.) issued a statement threatening the regime with a large-scale military response if it invaded the Yarmouk camp, as suggested by statements in the Lebanese press referring to the establishment of a brigade for this purpose, “Al-Yarmouk Brigade.” [5]

On January 26, Jabhat Al-Nusra executed a third resident of the camp accused of “blasphemy.” [6]

At the end of January, the children of Yarmouk organized a demonstration in front of the Youth Support Center under the banner “A Child’s Cry” to call for the lifting of the siege, while Fatah was criticized for organizing its movement’s anniversary in a restaurant a few kilometers from Yarmouk and more than a hundred camp residents were affected by an epidemic of jaundice. [7]

On March 11, 2015, the regime allowed a humanitarian convoy led by UNRWA chief Pierre Krahenbuhl to enter the camp after more than three months of interruption. [8] [9]

On March 30, 2015, Hamas leader Yahya Hourani (Abu Suhaib) was killed by a sniper, leading to the arrest of IS members by Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis. This event was the trigger for IS’s attack on Yarmouk the following day, during which a thousand IS fighters seized the camp from Al-Hajar al-Aswad with the help of Jabhat al-Nosra, which handed over the areas under its control. Three hundred Jabhat al-Nusra fighters had in fact broken their alliance with Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis and joined IS. [10] [11]

After a failed first assault on April 1, 2015, during which IS besieged the Diaspora Office (Maktab al-Shatat) held by Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis, the confrontation continued for two days along Nouh Ibrahim and ‘Atta az-Zeer streets, where IS faced both Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis and Jaysh al-Islam. ISIS finally seized 90% of the camp on April 4, prompting the regime to use 13 barrel bombs in a few days, whereas only two barrel bombs had been used on Yarmouk since the start of hostilities. Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis was then cornered on a narrow strip in the center of the camp, while the PFLP-GC and Fatah al-Intifada took advantage of this to seize the perimeter between the Municipality district and the Rujula mosque. [12] [13]

On April 6, 2015, Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis regrouped its forces in the south of the camp and launched an assault against ISIS, temporarily recapturing the Cultural Center area, Morocco Street, Al-Ja’ouneh Street, and the Martyrs’ Cemetery, momentarily controlling 40% of the camp. [14]

On April 7, 2015, a ceasefire was agreed, with ISIS ultimately controlling 95% of the camp. During the assault, five civilians were killed in the clashes, three were killed by shelling, two were beheaded by ISIS, and an eleventh was killed by an ISIS sniper. For its part, IS lost 40 of its fighters.

On April 8, 2015, 14 Palestinian factions met to attempt an alliance with regime forces against IS, but only the pro-Assad factions agreed to join forces with the regime.

On April 12, 2015, the Free Syrian Army and Jaysh al-Islam launched an offensive against ISIS and recaptured Al-Zeen Street between Yalda and Al-Hajar al-Aswad, but did not venture into Yarmouk, while Ahrar al-Sham remained entirely neutral towards ISIS.

On April 19, 2015, most of Jabhat al-Nosra’s fighters had joined ISIS, and Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis announced its dissolution, with some of its fighters joining the regime and others joining Jabhat al-Nosra, while a minority took refuge in the Yalda area controlled by the Free Syrian Army. In ten days of fighting, the regime dropped some 30 barrel bombs on Yarmouk, causing unprecedented damage to the camp and forcing 4,000 of its residents to flee to areas controlled by the FSA in Yalda (2,500), Babbila (1,000), and Beit Sahem (500). At the end of the fighting, IS controlled 80% of the camp and 23 Palestinian refugees had been killed since the beginning of the month. [15] [16] [17]

On April 22, 2015, ISIS withdrew to its stronghold in Al-Hajar al-Aswad and left the management of the camp to Jabhat al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham. [18] In reality, the border between IS and Jabhat al-Nusra was extremely porous, and there was no clear way to distinguish between militants from one group and the other. In June 2015, around 75 children aged between 7 and 13 were recruited by Jabhat al-Nusra and trained in combat by IS in Al-Hajar al-Aswad before being used as foot soldiers for various military tasks, including observing enemy movements from checkpoints and carrying out suicide operations. [19]

On December 25, 2015, an initial agreement was signed between the regime and ISIS providing for the evacuation of its wounded fighters from the neighboring district of Al-Qadam to other regions of Syria. [20]

By the end of 2015, only 14,000 residents remained in Yarmouk, while a typhus epidemic was spreading throughout the camp.

[1] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Palestinian Activists Launch a Campaign Titled #Save_Palestinians_of_Syria, 15 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/254/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/palestinian-activists-launch-a-campaign-titled-save-palestinians-of-syria

[2] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Civil Committees at the Yarmouk Camp Launch a Distress Call, After the Siege Victims Number Raised to (160), 15 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/257/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/civil-committees-at-the-yarmouk-camp-launch-a-distress-call-after-the-siege-victims-number-raised-to-160

[3] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Shooting and Recriminations Causing Aids Suspension at the Besieged Yarmouk, 11 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/226/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/shooting-and-recriminations-causing-aids-suspension-at-the-besieged-yarmouk

[4] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Violent Clashes Suspend Aids Distribution at the Yarmouk Camp, 18 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/278/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/violent-clashes-suspend-aids-distribution-at-the-yarmouk-camp

[5] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Armed Brigades Threaten to Ignite the Southern Region in Case of Breaking Into the Yarmouk Camp, 19 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/285/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/armed-brigades-threaten-to-ignite-the-southern-region-in-case-of-breaking-into-the-yarmouk-camp

[6] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Al Nusra Front Executes a Young Man in the Yarmouk Camp in Charges of Cursing the Name of God, 26 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/340/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/al-nusra-front-executes-a-young-man-in-the-yarmouk-camp-in-charges-of-cursing-the-name-of-god

[7] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, “A Child’s Scream” a Protest for the Yarmouk Children to take the Siege Away, 30 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/371/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/a-child-s-scream-a-protest-for-the-yarmouk-children-to-take-the-siege-away

[8] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, The Civil Council in the Yarmouk Camp Demands the PLO to assume its responsibilities towards the camp, 3 Janvier 2015, accessible à http://actionpal.org.uk/en/post/161/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/the-civil-council-in-the-yarmouk-camp-demands-the-plo-to-assume-its-responsibilities-towards-the-camp

[9] Middle East Eye, Aid convoy enters Damascus camp for first time in months, 11 Mars 2015, accessible à https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/aid-convoy-enters-damascus-camp-first-time-months

[10] Valentina Napolitano, Yarmouk: a War of All Against All, Noria Research, 28 Mai 2015, accessible à https://noria-research.com/yarmouk-a-war-of-all-against-all/

[11] The Syrian Observer, Aknaf Commander: Nusra Front, Regime Complicit in ISIS Capture of Yarmouk, Zaman al-Wasl, 8 Avril 2015, accessible à https://syrianobserver.com/syrian-actors/aknaf_commander_nusra_front_regime_complicit_isis_capture_yarmouk.html

[12] Middle East Eye, IS takes control of 90 percent of Yarmouk, called ‘hell hole’ by UN official, 4 Avril 2015, accessible à https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/takes-control-90-percent-yarmouk-called-hell-hole-un-official

[13] Hanadi Al-Khatib, (ARABE) ISIS releases video on Yarmouk camp, the endless victim, Al-Arabiya, 28 Avril 2015, accessible à https://shorturl.at/BUSy8

[14] Tariq Hammoud, Situation Assessment: Yarmouk Refugee Camp: What Happens Next?, Al-Zaytuna Centre for Studies & Consultations, 25 Mai 2015, accessible à https://eng.alzaytouna.net/2015/05/25/situation-assessment-yarmouk-refugee-camp-what-happens-next/

[15] Ramzy Baroud, My missing family in Syria: Naming and shaming in Yarmouk, Middle East Eye, 13 Avril 2015, accessible à https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/my-missing-family-syria-naming-and-shaming-yarmouk

[16] Linah Alsaafin, Unravelling the media spin on Yarmouk, Middle East Eye, 17 Avril 2015, accessible à https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/unravelling-media-spin-yarmouk

[17] Abdulrahman al-Masri, ‘ISIS and Nusra are one’ in Yarmouk Camp, Middle East Monitor, 19 Avril 2015, accessible à https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20150419-isis-and-nusra-are-one-in-yarmouk-camp/

[18] Hamza Al-Mustafa, Yarmouk: the victim of IS-Nusra power struggles, The New Arab, 22 Avril 2015, accessible à https://www.newarab.com/opinion/yarmouk-victim-nusra-power-struggles

[19] Palestine Square, Lost Childhood: Palestinian Child Soldiers in Yarmouk, Institute for Palestine Studies, 21 Septembre 2015, accessible à https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/232371

[20] Kate Ng, Syria and Isis reach deal to end Yarmouk camp siege, as wounded militants begin safe passage back to strongholds, The Independent, 25 Décembre 2015, accessible à https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-and-isis-reach-deal-to-end-yarmouk-camp-siege-as-wounded-militants-begin-safe-passage-back-to-strongholds-a6786031.html

Map No. 7: Yarmouk – Areas of influence at the beginning of 2015

Map No. 8: Yarmouk – Offensive by Islamic State and Jabhat al-Nusra, April 2015

2016–2018: Decay. Birds of prey fight over the carcass.

In January 2016, relations between IS and Jabhat al-Nosra began to deteriorate. The latter was then confined to the western part of the camp, between 30th Street and Saffouriyeh Street.

In 2016, the millionaire Qashlak signed an agreement with Fatah al-Intifada for the “Free Palestine Movement” to gain control of a segment of the front line managed by the latter, in exchange for a substantial sum of money. He hoped to increase the symbolic power of his mercenaries, who were now on the front line in the fight against IS.

On July 8, 2016, the regime began negotiations with Jabhat al-Nusra with a view to evacuating it from Yarmouk to Idlib. At the end of the month, Jabhat al-Nusra changed its name to Fatah al-Sham.

In the following months, IS laid siege to Fatah al-Sham and issued an ultimatum to residents of the area under its control, ordering them to leave before it was completely sealed off. At the same time, IS evacuated the area around Al-‘Urubeh Street between Yalda and al-Hajar al-Aswad during clashes with the FSA and Jaysh al-Islam. [1]

ISIS thus transformed Yarmouk into a fortified camp, while paranoia increased on both sides. On December 4, 2016, Fatah al-Sham executed Mohamed Aboud, known as “Abu Ali Khamseen,” accused of collaborating with ISIS.

By the end of 2016, an additional 6,250 residents had fled Yarmouk.

In January 2017, Fatah al-Sham became Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).

On May 8, 2017, around 50 HTS members, including 19 wounded, were evacuated by ambulance and bus to Idlib as part of the “Four Cities Agreement” initiated the previous year between the group and the regime. Three months later, the regime established a “new military zone” along its front with HTS, leading to the evacuation of several families and the conversion of their homes into military positions, while a Syrian Red Crescent mission escorted by the PFLP-GC was allowed to enter the HTS-held area on September 7. In addition, a truce was then in effect between the regime and IS. [2] [3]

On September 14, 2017, ISIS imposed a new siege on residents living in the HTS-controlled sector, which at the time had around 200 fighters, before launching an assault on Jaysh al-Islam and FSA factions (Liwa Sham al-Rasul, Jaysh al-Ababil, Kataeb al-Shuhada al-Islam, and the Islamic Union Ajnad al-Sham) south of Yarmouk, capturing the area where the hospital was under construction. At the same time, Jaysh al-Islam and the FSA signed a truce with the regime as part of the “de-escalation” agreements adopted in Cairo under the auspices of Egypt and Russia, which came into force on October 12. The next day, the regime resumed a series of airstrikes against IS positions in Al-Hajar al-Aswad, followed by skirmishes between Jaysh al-Islam and IS at the ‘Urubeh-Beirut checkpoint between Yalda and Yarmouk. [4] [5]

On November 11, 2017, the regime threatened the FSA with closing the Babbila-Sidi Miqdad checkpoint, the only link between the areas under regime control and the area under FSA control, if the FSA did not close the checkpoint Urubeh-Beirut was the only access point to the Yarmouk camp, which the rebels had reopened on November 4 but which could only be used by 10 to 15% of the population of Yarmouk, estimated at less than 8,000 people at the time. The FSA therefore temporarily closed access to the area controlled by ISIS, but reopened it in the following hours under pressure from Yarmouk residents who had taken refuge in Yalda. In response, the regime carried out its threats and closed the Babbila-Sidi Miqdad checkpoint on November 12, causing prices in the enclave to rise by 20%. It was not reopened until two months later. [6] [7]

On December 8, 2017, pro-regime militias launched an attack to recapture the Al-Rijeh district under HTS control, but to no avail. That same month, ISIS secured the signing of an initial agreement for the evacuation of 19 of its wounded fighters to the desert and Turkey, in exchange for easing the siege imposed on the district under HTS control to allow food to enter. [8] [9]

On December 13, ISIS launched an attack in Tadamon and seized a block of buildings controlled by the pro-regime militia Difa’a al-Watani for the first time since 2015, before the latter recaptured it and bombed Yarmouk for several weeks in retaliation. [10]

By the end of 2017, only 6,000 residents remained in Yarmouk.

[1] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, ISIS evacuates one of Yarmouk Streets from its Residents and starts Violent Clashes with the Opposition, 16 Août 2016, accessible à https://www.actionpal.org.uk/en/post/3762/news-and-reports/isis-evacuates-one-of-yarmouk-streets-from-its-residents-and-starts-violent-clashes-with-the-opposition

[2] Al-Jazeera, Deal sees Nusra fighters evacuate from Syria’s Yarmouk, 7 Mai 2017, accessible à https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/5/7/deal-sees-nusra-fighters-evacuate-from-syrias-yarmouk

[3] Zaman Al-Wasl, Wounded Nusra fighters evacuated from Yarmouk camp, 8 Mai 2017, accessible à https://en.zamanalwsl.net/news/article/25955

[4] The New Arab, Syrian rebel groups ‘agree to Damascus truce’ in Cairo, 12 Octobre 2017, accessible à https://www.newarab.com/news/syrian-rebel-groups-agree-southern-damascus-truce

[5] Tom Rollins, Escalation Threatens South Damascus “De-Escalation” Deal, Atlantic Council,  27 Octobre 2017, accessible à https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/escalation-threatens-south-damascus-de-escalation-deal/

[6] Ammar Hamou & Madeline Edwards, A ‘war of crossings’ in south Damascus as checkpoint closure cuts off encircled districts, Syria Direct, 13 Novembre 2017, accessible à https://syriadirect.org/a-war-of-crossings-in-south-damascus-as-checkpoint-closure-cuts-off-encircled-districts/

[7] Siege Watch, Ninth Quarterly Report on Besieged Areas in Syria, Janvier 2018, accessible à https://siegewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/pax-tsi-siegewatch-9.pdf

[8] Zaman Al-Wasl, 19 ISIS fighters evacuated by regime from southern Damascus, some reached Turkey, 14 Décembre 2017, accessible à https://en.zamanalwsl.net/news/article/31704

[9] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, ISIS allows the besieged residents of west Yarmouk camp to enter food, 29 Décembre 2017, accessible à https://www.actionpal.org.uk/en/post/6375/articles/isis-allows-the-besieged-residents-of-west-yarmouk-camp-to-enter-food

[10] Siege Watch, Ninth Quarterly Report on Besieged Areas in Syria, Janvier 2018, accessible à https://siegewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/pax-tsi-siegewatch-9.pdf

Map No. 9: Yarmouk – Areas of influence between 2015 and 2016

Map No. 10: Yarmouk – Areas of influence between 2016 and 2017

2018: Liquidation. The Islamists go for a bus ride.

On January 5, 2018, Jaysh al-Islam attempted a final offensive against ISIS from Yalda, without success.

Between 2016 and 2018, ISIS gradually imposed its totalitarianism and violence on the camp’s residents, banning the consumption or sale of cigarettes, breastfeeding, applause during weddings, ball games, photography, and the sale of wood for heating, while imposing strict dress codes for both women and men (length of trousers). IS also closed all schools within the camp (August 3, 2016) and prevented any school activities outside its control, while a curfew was imposed during prayer times, for which attendance at the mosque was mandatory. After finding that residents had circumvented the closure of schools in the camp, IS banned all students from attending alternative schools in adjacent towns (March 6, 2018), then forced all residents to attend Sharia law classes (April 16, 2018). Those who violated these rules were flogged, mutilated, or even executed: Musa al-Badawi, accused of being a spy for HTS (February 27, 2018); an unidentified man accused of insulting Allah (April 13, 2018); and Khaled Adnan Ahmed, accused of fighting alongside the regime (April 23, 2018).

In April, sensing increasing pressure from the regime, ISIS evacuated the Martyrs’ Cemetery neighborhood following clashes with the Free Palestine Movement in order to transform it into a military defense zone. [1] [2]

On April 19, 2018, the Syrian regime and its allies (PFLP-GC, Fatah al-Intifada, Liwa al-Quds, Difa’a Al-Watani, Jaysh At-Tahrir Al-Falasteen, Quwaat Der’a Al-Qalamun, etc.) launched a major offensive to recapture the outskirts of Damascus. This was accompanied by intensive and frenzied bombing of the Yarmouk, Tadamon, Hajar al-Aswad, and Yalda by the Russian air force (400 air strikes and the massive use of explosive barrels, mortar shells, and surface-to-surface missiles, including Russian UR-77 “Serpents Gorynysh” destroyers). 5,000 residents of Yarmouk fled to the Yalda-Babbila area, leaving fewer than 1,200 people behind. [3]

The next day, the air force violently struck Jaysh al-Islam positions between Yalda and Hajar al-Aswad, forcing it to withdraw from its front line with ISIS and allowing regime forces to move into the gap. At the same time, regime forces surrounded the camp and made several attempts to capture the area held by HTS with the support of heavy weapons and armored vehicles, but were held back. IS, for its part, fought fiercely on all fronts, against both HTS and regime forces and their allies. [4]

On April 27, a first group of 15 wounded Jaysh al-Islam fighters was evacuated to northern Syria as part of a transitional agreement with the regime, while negotiations continued for the complete evacuation of the area. At the same time, regime forces carried out 165 airstrikes on the area on the same day, burning down around 100 homes in Yarmouk and Tadamon.

On April 29, an agreement between the regime and HTS on the one hand, and the FSA on the other, provided for the imminent evacuation of HTS, Jaysh al-Islam, Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis, Sham al-Rasul, and Jaysh al-Ababil. The Uruba-Beirut checkpoint was transferred to Russian forces, while the Babbila-Sidi Miqdad checkpoint was partially reopened for civilians to pass through.

On May 1, 2018, the 150 HTS fighters and their families (425 people) were evacuated from Yarmouk first from the northern entrance of the camp, followed from May 3 to 7 by the 1,700 fighters from the FSA, Jaysh al-Islam, and Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis factions accompanied by their families (9,250 people out of the 17,000 planned), evacuated from Yalda, Babbila, and Beit Sahem to Al-Bab (Idlib) in seven convoys of 61 buses in total. In parallel with these evacuation operations, the regime continued its intense bombardment of IS positions. [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

From May 8 to 13, around 20 residents of Yarmouk seeking to flee the bombing were held for several days by government forces at the Uruba-Beirut checkpoint, most of them over 60 years old, before the militias in charge of the checkpoint opened fire on the crowd, killing three people.

Finally, a new agreement, a secret one this time, between ISIS and the regime planned the evacuation of its 1,200 fighters still stationed in Yarmouk, along with their families (600 people). The evacuation was finally carried out on May 20, 2018, using around 50 buses to transport IS to the desert east of Suwayda. The regime thus regained full control of the Yarmouk camp and its surroundings after more than five years and ten months of clashes and bombings that left 80% of the camp’s buildings and infrastructure destroyed. [11] [12]

On May 22, 2018, the UN reported that an agreement to which it had not been party had led to the displacement of 400 Palestinian refugees to the province of Hama.

In May and June, the regime’s army organized the systematic looting of the camp’s infrastructure and buildings under the supervision of the infamous “Fourth Division,” arresting and summarily executing several residents who tried to resist, including two children: Rami Mohammed Salman (15) at the “Tabah” checkpoint and Mahmoud Bakr in Al-‘Urubeh Street [13]. Some buildings were also set on fire after being looted, as in Lubya, Safad, and Al-Ja’ouneh Streets [14] [15]. In addition, it imposed heavy fines (US$50 to US$150) for passing through the checkpoints, preventing hundreds of residents from accessing their homes [16]. At the same time, the regime prevented residents from recovering the bodies of at least 30 civilians killed during the bombings and left in the rubble [17]. It was not until 2019 that the regime allowed residents to return to Yarmouk.

In July, the Action Group for Palestinians of Syria counted 1,392 victims among its Palestinian residents during the period 2011-2018, their deaths resulting from bombing, siege, sniper fire, or torture in the regime’s prisons. [18]

Thus, Yarmouk was “liberated” by the Assad regime, a great defender of the Palestinian cause…

[1] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Fighting between ISIS and the Free Palestine Movement on the Martyrs’ sector axis in Yarmouk camp, 1 Mars 2018, accessible à https://www.actionpal.org.uk/en/post/6700/action-group-for-palestinians-of-syria/fighting-between-isis-and-the-free-palestine-movement-on-the-martyrs-sector-axis-in-yarmouk-camp

[2] Waleed Abu al-Khair, ISIS in Yarmouk prepares for Syrian regime onslaught, Diyaruna, 13 Avril 2018, accessible à https://diyaruna.com/en_GB/articles/cnmi_di/features/2018/04/13/feature-03

[3] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Victims and large-scale destruction after the hysterical bombardment of Yarmouk camp, 21 Avril 2018, accessible à https://www.actionpal.org.uk/en/post/6981/victims-and-large-scale-destruction-after-the-hysterical-bombardment-of-yarmouk-camp

[4] Siege Watch, Tenth Quarterly Report Part 2 – The Culmination of “Surrender or Die”, Mai 2018, accessible à https://siegewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PAX-report-Siege-Watch-10b.pdf

[5] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Explosive barrels and air raids on Yarmouk camp, and violent clashes on all its axes, 7 Mai 2018, accessible à https://www.actionpal.org.uk/en/post/7074/articles/explosive-barrels-and-air-raids-on-yarmouk-camp-and-violent-clashes-on-all-its-axes

[6] Maureen Clare Murphy, Armed insurgents evacuate Yarmouk, The Electronic Intifada, 1 Mai 2018, accessible à https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/maureen-clare-murphy/armed-insurgents-evacuate-yarmouk

[7] Ammar Hamou, Mohammed Al-Haj Ali & Tariq Adely, Parallel evacuations to begin in two besieged pockets as Syrian government moves to clear remaining rebels from capital, Syria Direct, 30 Avril 2018, accessible à https://syriadirect.org/parallel-evacuations-to-begin-in-two-besieged-pockets-as-syrian-government-moves-to-clear-remaining-rebels-from-capital/

[8] Ersin Celik, Evacuation convoy from Syria’s Yarmouk reaches Al-Bab, Yeni Safak, 4 Mai 2018, accessible à https://www.yenisafak.com/en/world/evacuation-convoy-from-syrias-yarmouk-reaches-al-bab-3360548

[9] Burak Karacaoglu, Esref Musa & Mahmoud Barakat, 4th convoy leaves Syria’s Yarmouk under evacuation deal, Anadolu Agency, 7 Mai 2018, accessible à https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/4th-convoy-leaves-syrias-yarmouk-under-evacuation-deal/1137840

[10] Ersin Celik, Evacuations remain underway from Syria’s Homs, Yarmouk, Yeni Safak, 9 Mai 2018, accessible à https://www.yenisafak.com/en/world/evacuations-remain-underway-from-syrias-homs-yarmouk-3380935

[11] Middle East Eye, Syrian army moves into Yarmouk after IS evacuation deal, 21 Mai 2018, accessible à https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/syrian-army-moves-yarmouk-after-evacuation-deal

[12] The Defense Post, Syrian army says Damascus ‘completely secure’ after taking Yarmouk camp from ISIS, 21 Mai 2018, accessible à https://thedefensepost.com/2018/05/21/syria-army-control-damascus-isis-ousted/

[13] Palestinian Refugees Portal, (ARABE) Camp de Yarmouk : Un deuxième enfant tué par les forces du régime après s’être opposé au « pillage », 26 Mai 2018, accessible à https://shorturl.at/eNev0

[14] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, (ARABE) 70 % des bâtiments et des quartiers du camp de Yarmouk sont détruits ; les pilleurs volent les câbles électriques souterrains, 29 Mai 2018, accessible à http://www.actionpal.org.uk/ar/post/9879

[15] Palestinian Refugees Portal, (ARABE) Camp de Yarmouk : Incendie des maisons et pillage du sous-sol, 4 Juin 2018, accessible à https://shorturl.at/D6iWk

[16] Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, (ARABE) « Des sucreries pour la libération », un nouveau mode de chantage de l’armée du régime contre les résidents du camp de Yarmouk, 31 Mai 2018, accessible à http://www.actionpal.org.uk/ar/post/9899

[17] Palestinian Refugees Portal, (ARABE) Camp de Yarmouk : Des corps sous les décombres des installations de l’UNRWA… Pourquoi n’intervenez-vous pas pour les récupérer? , 30 Mai 2018, accessible à https://shorturl.at/f0KaG

[18]

Photos of various evacuation operations carried out by HTS, factions associated with the FSA, and Islamic State.

Map No. 11: Yarmouk – Areas of influence between 2017 and May 2018

Map No. 12: Yarmouk – Areas of influence between May 2 and May 7, 2018

Map No. 13: Yarmouk – Areas of influence between May 10 and May 21, 2018

Map No. 14: Yarmouk – Total takeover of Yarmouk by the regime on May 21, 2018

2024: Recovery. Yarmouk, a ghost town.

Over the next five years, only 15,300 residents, 80% of whom were Palestinian refugees, were able to return to their homes (4,500 families) or at least to the ruins of their former homes, after applying for permission to return. This permission was granted sparingly, only to those whose homes were deemed viable and who could provide proof of ownership or other documentation proving their previous residence. Those who had previously been arrested, convicted, called up for military conscription, or had links to the armed factions that had controlled the territory were excluded from the procedure, the latter criterion being entirely subjective and left to the discretion of the Fourth Division agents.

The Rehabilitation Oversight Committee estimated that 40% of the buildings were in good condition, 40% needed reinforcement and repairs, and 20% were completely destroyed and needed to be cleared and rebuilt.

The management of the camp was entrusted to the “General Authority for Palestinian Arab Refugees,” a body under the auspices of the Yarmouk branch of the Ba’ath Party, led by Ali Mustafa. This body was regularly criticized by residents for its inaction and corruption, one of the main problems being the prohibitive prices of real estate and the lack of rehabilitation of vital infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage). The 12 municipal employees were notably accused by residents of blackmail and corruption.

When the regime fell in December 2024, 736 Palestinians from Yarmouk had been taken prisoner and 1,530 killed out of the 1,600 Palestinians from Syria taken prisoner and 3,685 killed since 2011. Among them, 94 members affiliated with Hamas had been executed, including Mamoun Al-Jaloudi. [1] [2]

* * *

Yarmouk is a symbol. The Assad regime must be held primarily responsible for the annihilation of Syria’s largest Palestinian refugee camp, whose violent assault beginning in the second half of 2012 was a continuation of that of the Palestinian camps in Dera’a and Latakia a few months earlier. Contrary to what the regime’s propaganda has repeatedly claimed in order to discredit the popular opposition movements and the armed rebellion, the spread of takfiri/jihadist groups was not the cause and justification for its use of violence, but its consequence: in Yarmouk, Jabhat al-Nusra—along with its offshoots Fatah al-Sham and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham – and the Islamic State took advantage of the vacuum and chaos left by the indiscriminate bombing at the end of 2012, followed by the exhaustion of the anti-Assad Palestinian self-defense militias during the two years of siege that followed, to seize a camp that had been transformed into a ghost town without encountering any resistance. And when their task of eliminating any possibility of future resistance was accomplished, the regime systematically moved them elsewhere by bus so that they could attack other rebel pockets or unyielding communities, as was the case with the Druze of Suwayda in July 2018. Throughout the process of destroying Yarmouk, the Palestinian militias loyal to Assad demonstrated their deep corruption and abject complicity in the regime’s crimes. This position, contrary to the interests of Palestinian civilians, can only be explained by these factions’ desire to preserve their existence and their political and military influence: none of them wanted to suffer the fate of Arafat’s Fatah and its fedayeen. Their survival depended on the regime as much as the regime’s survival depended on Iran and Russia. By allying themselves with the latter to crush Yarmouk, they placed themselves on the same level as Hezbollah and Bashar’s shabiha, serving the interests of their masters rather than those of the people. Paradoxically, the true defenders of the Palestinian people of Yarmouk, members of the Coordination Committees and micro-factions who did not give in to either the regime or the Islamists and fought alongside civilians from within the camp, have been virtually forgotten. It is now up for us to restore their memory.

The Palestinian, Syrian, Lebanese, and Jordanian peoples are one, and everything that divides them is merely the result of Western colonialism and its maneuvers to prevent progressive Arab forces from prevailing over conservative forces. The point of junction between the four peoples lies on the slopes of the Golan Heights, and none of them can be liberated without the liberation of all. It is up to each of us to understand the meaning of this conclusion, at a time when the Zionist colonial army is seizing the Litani and Ruqqad valleys after having militarily annexed those of the Jordan and Arabah.

[1] The New Arab, Nearly 4,000 Palestinians ‘killed’ in Syria’s brutal war, 28 Mars 2018, accessible à https://www.newarab.com/news/nearly-4000-palestinians-killed-syrias-brutal-war

[2] The New Arab, Assad’s regime executed dozens of Hamas members without trial, intelligence documents reveal, 7 Janvier 2025, accessible à https://www.newarab.com/news/dozens-hamas-members-executed-assads-syria-prisons

REPORTS ABOUT YARMOUK:

  • Palestinians of Syria, Between Bitterness of Reality and the Hope of Return – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Juin 2014.
  • Palestinians of Syria, The Bleeding Wound – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Février 2015
  • Yarmouk Siege has not ended – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, 23 Juin 2015
  • Palestinians of Syria, Bloody Diary and Unheard Screaming – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria & Palestinian Return Center, Septembre 2015
  • Yarmouk, the Full Truth – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Juillet 2015.
  • Palestinians of Syria and The Closed Doors – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, 2017
  • Status Report on Yarmouk Camp – The Carter Center, 14 Novembre 2017.
  • Yarmouk, The Abandoned Pain – EuroMed Monitor, Juillet 2018.
  • Yarmouk Camp set on Fire – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Democratic Republic Studies Center, Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, 22 Avril 2018.
  • Status Report on the Conditions of Yarmouk Camp 2024 – Action Group for Palestinians in Syria, Décembre 2024.

 

Northern entrance to Yarmouk Street and Palestine Street from Fawzi Al-Kawikji Street, April–June 2025.
Yarmouk police station and Rahma Hospital, Fauzi al-Kawikji street, north entrance to Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
First front line (2012), North of Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Square al-Rijeh (former site of humanitarian distributions), Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
Former front line between HTS and the Assad regime, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Intérieur de la Mosquée Al Habib Al Mustafa, Yarmouk, Avril-Juin 2025.
View of the former front line between HTS and the Assad regime from the Al-Mutamid ibn Abbad school, April-June 2025
View on Al-Mutamid ibn Abbad school from the 15th Street, April-June 2025 - 33°28'23.3"N 36°18'05.4"E
View from the top of a school - former frontline between HTS and ISIS, Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
Street behind Al-Wassim Mosque, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Martyr Fayez Halawa Hospital, Yarmouk Street, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Municipality building, Palestine Street, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Lubia Street to the west, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Falasteen Mosque, Al-Quds Street, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Palestine Square, Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
Former frontline between Aknaf Beit al-Makdis and the Islamic State, between Al-Ezz bin Abdul Salam and Kafr Sabat schools, Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
Arab Cultural Center (UN-run), Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
Martyrs' Cemetery, 30th Street, Yarmouk, April-June 2025.
Crossroads of Yarmouk Street and 30th Street East (Salah Ed-Deen Al-Ayyoubi), Yarmouk, April-June 2025
30th Street (Salah Ed-Deen Al-Ayyoubi) dir. East, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
PFLP-GC headquarters, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Northbound 15th Street entrance from 30th Street (former checkpoint), April-June 2025.
30th Street West (Salah Ed-Deen Al-Ayyoubi), Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Taqqadom entrance from 30th Street, Yarmouk, April-June 2025
Yarmouk-1
Yarmouk-1
Yarmouk-6
Yarmouk-22
Yarmouk-17
Yarmouk-26
Yarmouk-55
Yarmouk-29
Yarmouk-70
Yarmouk-81
Yarmouk-83
Yarmouk-110
Yarmouk-162
Yarmouk-148
Yarmouk-86
Yarmouk-96
Yarmouk-98
Yarmouk-72
Yarmouk-105
Yarmouk-133
Yarmouk-41
Yarmouk-34
Yarmouk-68
Yarmouk-134
previous arrow
next arrow
 
Yarmouk-1
Yarmouk-1
Yarmouk-6
Yarmouk-22
Yarmouk-17
Yarmouk-26
Yarmouk-55
Yarmouk-29
Yarmouk-70
Yarmouk-81
Yarmouk-83
Yarmouk-110
Yarmouk-162
Yarmouk-148
Yarmouk-86
Yarmouk-96
Yarmouk-98
Yarmouk-72
Yarmouk-105
Yarmouk-133
Yarmouk-41
Yarmouk-34
Yarmouk-68
Yarmouk-134
previous arrow
next arrow

Is Ahmed Al-Sharaa mocking the Syrians?

The fall of the Assad regime on December 8, 2024 was an undeniable liberation for millions of Syrians, who suddenly and unexpectedly emerged from fifty years of totalitarian barbarism that had transformed Syria into a field of ruins doubling as a concentration camp archipelago, since which several hundred thousand civilians have disappeared or been forced into exile.

Liberation, not revolution

As early as December 9, Ahmed al-Sharaa proclaimed himself leader of the new Syria, categorically rejecting all forms of power-sharing, decentralization and federalism, while taking care never to use the term democracy, before declaring in an interview with Syria TV on December 15 – just one week after the fall of Assad – that it was now “crucial to abandon the revolutionary mentality”. It is legitimate to ask: When was Al-Sharaa ever revolutionary?

On December 29, Al-Sharaa asserted that no elections could be held for another four years, which is understandable given the deplorable situation of Syrian civil society, but not at all reassuring coming from a person who rejects the very concept of democracy, whatever its form. At the same time, he announced the forthcoming adoption of a new constitution at a hypothetical National Dialogue Conference, which would bring the transition period to a close. At this stage, the most optimistic were still waiting to “see what happens”.

On January 29, Al-Sharaa was appointed President of the Syrian Arab Republic by the Syrian General Command (embodied by himself) at a “Victory Conference”. The Syrian constitution and all the institutions inherited from the Baath Party and the Assad dictatorship were subsequently abolished. No one will regret them.

On February 12, Al-Sharaa set up a 7-member preparatory committee[1] to organize the National Dialogue Conference, which took 10 days to prepare and opened on February 24. It brought together 600 people – many of whom had been invited less than two days earlier by SMS – and excluded any representation from the Syrian Northeast Autonomous Administration and the Syrian Democratic Forces. The discussions lasted just one day, and objectively achieved nothing, apart from a superficial reaffirmation of the needs already formulated by everyone: transitional justice, respect for public and political freedoms, the role of civil society organizations in rebuilding the country, constitutional and institutional reform, respect for national sovereignty and the State monopoly on arms. To this was added a symbolic declaration condemning the Israeli incursion.

On March 2, Al-Sharaa set up a 5-member committee[2] to draft a proposed constitution, which was drawn up in 10 days and adopted on March 13 for a 5-year transitional period. The new constitution stipulates that the president must be of Muslim faith and makes Islamic jurisprudence a pillar of constitutional law, while pledging to “protect minorities”, as Bashar al-Assad had also pledged. Four days later, several hundred Alawite civilians were massacred on the coast.

On March 29, Al-Sharaa dissolved the provisional government led by Prime Minister Mohammed al-Bashir, replacing it with a Transitional Government and appointing 23 ministers[3], nine of them from HTS. With civil society insisting on respect for diversity and women’s rights, Al-Sharaa appointed the only woman in the government, also a Christian, to the post of Minister of Social Affairs. If he’d wanted to be cynical, he couldn’t have done a better job. In addition, all ministers are now appointed directly by the President, while the position of Prime Minister has been abolished. It should be pointed out that a presidential regime without a prime minister is not very different from a monarchy.

In less than three months, Ahmed al-Sharaa has subtly and without opposition established himself as head of state, implementing a presidential regime that can best be described as autocratic.

Political transition in the shadow of the Astana agreements

Since 1970, Syria has followed in the footsteps of its Russian sponsor. If we are familiar with the Russian system of power and analyze the Syrian system under Assad, we discover the same modes of predation, plunder and clan-based corruption, the same cynical contempt of the loyalist elites for the majority of the people, the same policy of abandonment and voluntary impoverishment of the country, but also and finally the same collective cult of the leader, Even if he clearly lacks charisma. Ironically, Assad came to power at the same time as Putin, becoming both his copy and his disciple. Since the start of the popular revolution in 2011, Assad has acted exactly as Putin does or would do in his own country in the event of an insurrection, by denying the very existence of the revolt and causing half the country’s population to die, disappear or flee, rather than engaging in any semblance of reform that might win back a modicum of popular support. Obstinacy and criminal denial are what Assad and Putin have most in common. The only real difference between them is that Putin has not yet experienced a full-scale popular uprising, and has therefore not had the opportunity to deploy his totalitarian know-how to the full.

In reality, nothing could be worse than the Assad regime, and the only valid comparison would be with the Stalinist dictatorship. The model remains Russian, always. Consequently, the shadow of Russia will not cease to hang over the lives of Syrians overnight. What’s more, it’s legitimate to think that Assad’s downfall could only have been achieved with Putin’s cooperation or consent. Before crying conspiracy, let’s recall a few facts we all know.

Russia has no friends, only clients, vassals and debtors. Syria has lived on Russia’s and then Iran’s credit for several decades, and their interventionism in the Syrian civil war was motivated by the need to repay the debts contracted by the Assad clan. Like the United States, Turkey and the Gulf petro-monarchies, each has placed its pawns on the Syrian chessboard, modifying alliances and geostrategic priorities according to circumstances and their fluctuating interests. Against their will, or even without their knowledge, Syrian communities and factions have become the proxies of a game that has quickly overtaken them. And any attempt to detect a logic based on polarized alliances, axes or camps with clear demarcations is bound to be misguided or mistaken. There are no friendships or solidarities between states, only opportunities and maneuvers.

From the outset of the popular uprising in 2011, Iran and Hezbollah were the first to intervene to protect the Syrian regime and keep control of the routes between Iraq and Lebanon, while developing their military-commercial hold in Syria. The USA, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, with logistical support from Jordan, Great Britain and Israel, intervened in parallel, supplying arms to nearly fifty groups linked to the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian opposition embodied by the Syrian Interim Government in exile (in Turkey), including Islamist groups linked to the al-Nosra Front and united from 2015 under the umbrella of the Army of Conquest. Qatar and Turkey are thus among the main creditors of the al-Nosra Front (2012-2017), then Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (2016-2017) and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (2017-2025).

With the Russian intervention, the capture of Kobane and the Paris attacks by the Islamic State in 2015, the strategies of both sides have evolved. The Paris attacks, following on from Assad’s release of Islamist prisoners in 2011, largely contributed to the international community turning its gaze away from the regime’s barbarity to focus on the jihadist scarecrow. Each has thus justified its intervention in Syria by the fight against the Islamic State: the United States gradually withdrew its support for Salafist groups to redirect it in favor of the Kurdish YPG/YPJ, then the FDS, with a focus on the fight against the Islamic State, while Russia sent its Wagner mercenaries to recruit Syrians into the “ISIS hunters” battalion before sending them to secure the regime’s oil farms or serve as cannon fodder in Libya (which Turkey also did). But in reality, the Islamic State was struck with one hand and fed with the other by Turkey, Russia and the Assad regime alike, which never ceased to dispose of jihadist cells as it suited them, moving them from right to left to commit atrocities to divert attention from their own crimes and intrigues, destabilizing certain areas or populations that bothered them, or to legitimize the use of force where they lacked sufficiently valid reasons. The jihadist is a practical tool.

And contrary to popular belief, Russia, the United States and its allies (Jordan, Israel and Turkey) have not clashed militarily on Syrian soil[4]. On the contrary, in 2016 and 2017, the US, Russia and Turkey reached an agreement to set up joint air operations aimed at striking Islamic State and al-Nosra Front[5] [6]positions. Following on from this, Russia signed agreements with the USA, Israel and Jordan in 2017[7] [8] to keep the Islamists (Hezbollah and Islamic State) out of the Golan Heights and the Jordanian border, which led to the recapture of Deraa by the Syrian regime and Russia in 2018, culminating in the elimination of the Islamic State pocket in the Yarmouk basin and the surrender of the Deraa rebels as well as their integration into the normalization processes with Assad. It should be noted that all the agreements signed by Russia were signed with the consent of Bashar al-Assad[9]. Without going into further detail, it is quite clear that in the Syrian context there has never been any real duality between the “axis of evil” and the “axis of resistance”.

As early as 2015, two influential figures close to the Syrian and Russian regimes, Randa Kassis and Fabien Baussart, had begun suggesting the implementation of a peace process for Syria at a conference in Astana, Kazakhstan. After two years of fruitless talks in Geneva under the aegis of the UN, Astana finally established itself in 2017 as a negotiating space between Russia, Turkey, Iran, the Assad regime and a dozen Syrian rebel factions, led by Jaysh al-Islam, with the UN relegated to observer status. Russia and Turkey clearly showed their leadership in the discussions, with Russia even proposing a draft constitution for the future “Republic of Syria”, introducing a decentralized, federalist and secular system that would abolish Islamic jurisprudence as the source of law.  Turkey, the Arab League, the pro-Turkish opposition and Al-Assad were categorically opposed to any form of federalism. To better understand the content and outcome of these talks in the light of recent events, it may be useful to recall that Russia had proposed Assad’s resignation back in 2012, but that this proposal had been refused by the USA, Great Britain and France on the pretext that Assad was “about to be overthrown” (sic). It seems that Turkey has taken the lead over Russia in these negotiations between 2019 and 2023, before designing in its corner the modalities of the political transition in Syria. Russia has been stymied by Bashar Al-Assad’s obstinacy in believing himself invincible and obstructing any proposals for constitutional reform, particularly since his return to the international stage at the Arab League summit in Jeddah in June 2023.

On the eve of the regime’s fall, Russia, Turkey and Iran met in Doha in the presence of 5 members of the Arab League (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Jordan and Qatar) to declare the end of hostilities. In the wake of this, the Russian air force suddenly halted its strikes after nine years of incessant bombing, and Russian troops peacefully withdrew to their bases in Hmeimim and Tartus, where they remain to this day in application of the Doha agreements. Under these agreements, Russia gave Assad, his clan and his allies guarantees of security and amnesty in exchange for the general withdrawal of his army, while Iran negotiated the protection of Shi’ite holy sites. On the evening of December 7-8, Assad’s inner circle packed their bags, before being efficiently evacuated by plane from Syria to Russia and the Gulf States, including Bashar Jaafari, the main negotiator of the Astana agreements and Syria’s ambassador to Russia[10]. All without Israel shooting down their aircraft in flight, obviously.

As early as December 29, 2024, Al-Sharaa declared that Syria shared deep strategic interests with Russia, evacuating out of hand its manifest complicity with the Assad regime and the latter’s responsibility for the massacre of thousands of civilians since 2015[11].

At the end of January 2025, a Russian delegation led by Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov and Russian Special Envoy to Syria Alexander Lavrentyev came to Damascus to set the framework and criteria for further bilateral relations. Al-Sharaa then laid down its conditions, demanding financial compensation for the crimes committed and the extradition of Assad to Syria, knowing full well that Russia would never agree.

At the beginning of March, just as the massacres on the coast had driven hundreds of Alawite civilians to take refuge on the Hmeimim base, Russia hypocritically offered its help to stabilize the situation in Syria. The following month saw the beginnings of a new military cooperation with Turkey and Russia, with Al-Sharaa admitting that the bulk of Syria’s military equipment was supplied by Russia, that Syria remained dependent on numerous contracts with Russia in the food and energy sectors, and that its veto power at the United Nations posed a serious threat to the prospect of lifting the sanctions that were heavily affecting the country.

What we can conclude from all this data is that the destiny of the Syrians will remain intimately linked to the desiderata of Erdogan and Putin. We could call this constraint the “Curse of Astana”.

What about foreign jihadists?

First, a few biographical and contextual facts.

Ahmed al-Sharaa was born in 1982 in the same place as Osama bin Laden – Riyadh, Saudi Arabia – and lived in Syria between 1989 and 2003. Before the start of the American invasion of Iraq, he went to Baghdad, where he joined the Iraqi branch of Al-Qaeda, which its leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had just founded after pledging allegiance to Bin Laden. Arrested in 2006, he then spent five years in American prisons. Released after bin Laden’s elimination on May 2, 2011, his successor Ayman al-Zawahiri sent al-Sharaa to Syria in August to establish the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda, Jabhat al-Nusra, in collaboration with the Islamic State in Iraq then led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. As fate would have it, at exactly the same time, Bashar al-Assad amnestied and released hundreds of Islamists from Sednaya prison, including a number of notorious militants[12] who simultaneously set up, within a quarter of their release, the main Salafist groups responsible for the fragmentation and subsequent Islamization of the Free Syrian Army (FSA): Liwa al-Islam, Suqour al-Sham and Ahrar al-Sham.

In the world of Islamist armed groups, armed confrontations, wars of power, alliances of circumstance and recompositions have followed one another unceasingly, culminating in large-scale mergers in 2017 within the Syrian National Army (Jaysh al-Watani as-Suri) and the Levant Liberation Organization (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, HTS), under the aegis of Turkey. These recompositions coincide with international negotiations within the framework of the Astana process mentioned above. This was the moment when a number of Islamist factions, faced with a stalemate in their trench warfare with the Assad regime, were prompted to change their strategy and adopt a nationalist and revolutionary rhetoric, while cleaning up on their most radical wings. Al-Sharaa’s associate and accomplice since 2011, Anas Hassan Khattab, held the position of HTS intelligence officer[13], a position he retains in the Syrian government. In this position he was responsible for eliminating HTS rivals in the Idleb pocket, notably Hurras al-Din and DAESH cells, an operation he carried out in collaboration with Turkish and US intelligence services.

Their jihadist approach was then gradually abandoned in favor of a political and technocratic management of the areas under their control, embodied in particular by the new Syrian Salvation Government. Clearly, Turkey and Russia exerted a major influence on the evolution of the Syrian rebellion at this time, even though the two main factions forming HTS did not participate in the Astana negotiations[14]. Nevertheless, no one is deceived by the role played by the two imperialists in this cynical game of chess.

At that time, Ahmed al-Sharaa was still Abu Mohammad al-Joulani, and whatever his populist strategy of “Syrianization” to become a credible interlocutor on the international stage, everyone knows very well that he could never have kept control of the situation without keeping at his side the jihadist dogs of war that have always formed the core of his troops. And among them, the hundreds of international jihadi hitmen whom he would need to thank should he win the final battle to topple Al-Assad.

This is precisely what happened after the fall of the regime. In late December 2024, Al-Sharaa appointed several Syrian and foreign jihadists[15] and war criminals from its inner circle to positions of authority in the new army, referring to the forthcoming dissolution of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group as a precondition for lifting sanctions against the HTS leadership and Syria. A month later, 18 armed factions declared that they were disbanding to join the new national army, although no official list of the factions concerned was made public.

In concrete terms, hundreds of criminals benefited from a general amnesty and the normalization of jihad. A month later, the transitional government announced that it was considering granting citizenship to foreign anti-Assad fighters who had lived in Syria for several years, a decision that would not prevent the lifting of sanctions against Syria, even though this appeared to be a central demand on the part of the United States.

Rewarding its mercenaries seems more important than finally alleviating the suffering of Syrians: normalizing international jihad or Syrian revolution, Al-Sharaa seems to have chosen. We can also read in the background that the new strongman of Damascus may not have a complete choice, and that after years of trying to purify his ranks of the most extremists following the wise advice of his Turkish godfather, nobody knows better than he does that the only way to continue reigning supreme over a furious horde is to keep it close to you and share pieces of the feast with it. Nor is he unaware that many jihadists want him dead, especially now that he’s shaking hands with all their sworn enemies.

To illustrate this nepotism, the provisional government announced a few days earlier that it had begun the process of revoking the citizenship of almost 740,000 foreign pro-Assad fighters, including Iranians, Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis and Lebanese. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Rather than guaranteeing justice for all crimes committed against Syrians, Al-Sharaa’s decision confirms that all foreign mercenaries are not treated equally. Hence, his own can continue to persecute infidels and heretics in peace.

Sectarianism and tribalism: the twin scourges of Syria

When Turkey whispered in Al-Sharaa’s ear that federalist demands must not be given free rein, it was a clear message not only to the armed Kurdish factions, but also to all other armed and political forces drawn from minorities. Everyone immediately thought of the Alawites and the Druze. The former have no armed factions attached to communal demands, apart from the remnants of the regime who are still hiding here and there, but who neither represent nor protect their community. The latter, on the contrary, benefit from powerful community self-defense structures embodied by more than twenty factions committed to protecting the integrity, interests and cultural identity of their community, while enjoying solid solidarity networks among Druze communities abroad, particularly in occupied Palestine, Lebanon and among the diaspora in the rest of the world.

For the new authority in Damascus, the three communities represent a considerable balance of power and diplomatic stakes, and even a threat to the hegemonic, centralized and mono-confessional state project defended by Al-Sharaa and its main international sponsors: Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. On the other hand, Russia, the United States and Israel are on the lookout to exploit the three communities’ demands for autonomy or decentralization, while Europe and the UN are eternally applying the same paternalistic schemes that would have us believe that minorities need protectors – and therefore a protectorate – even though a majority of the populations we’re talking about don’t wish to be chaperoned or protected by foreign powers. But whatever the true opinion of the various populations, the sectarianism that the Assad regime has promoted for several decades continues to prevail over any egalitarian or democratic consideration. Conspiracy theories, binary analyses and even analyses clearly based on sectarian or xenophobic biases combine with the aggressive propaganda of the various imperialisms to produce a constant media noise in which it is impossible to see clearly and keep a cool head. In contrast to 2011, when instant communication was still relatively undeveloped, social networks are now joining the traditional media in conveying and giving resonance to the most implausible rumors, which are nonetheless credible enough to incite anyone to violence and denial of the crimes committed. This is how, when the regime fell, the paranoid fantasies of the West about the massacre of minorities came true in part, like self-fulfilling prophecies, but less suddenly than predicted.

Before continuing, it is absolutely essential to distinguish between the scenario of the Syrian Coast massacres in early March and the violent confrontations targeting the Druze community in early May. In the former case, it was the remnants of the deposed regime, united in groups called the “Coastal Shield Brigade”, the “Military Council for the Liberation of Syria” and the “Syrian Popular Resistance”[16], who initiated the confrontation with the central authority in Damascus. Several sources suggest that these groups, made up of war criminals and torturers who remained loyal to Assad, were supported by Russia and/or Iran in an attempt to foment a takeover of power on the coast, or even beyond. In any case, these few hundred remnants launched a coordinated offensive against checkpoints, government buildings and hospitals, seizing entire districts in the towns of Jableh, Baniyas and Qardaha and indiscriminately attacking civilians and the Security forces who had arrived to put an end to the insurgency. In the bosom of General Security and in response to its call for volunteers on Telegram[17], thousands of radical fighters more or less affiliated to Salafist groups, themselves more or less affiliated to the Syrian National Army and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, rushed to the coast with the intention of punishing loyalists as well as the entire Alawite civilian community from which they hail. Among these, there are still groups that have not disbanded, and are even hostile to Al-Sharaa, but regard General Security as one of the armed wings of the Sunni community seeking revenge. The loyalist insurrection and the ensuing ethno-confessional cleansing resulted in the massacre of between 823 and 1659 civilians and the death of around 260 fighters on each side[18], with both sides participating in the massacre of civilians.

In the second case, it all started with the broadcasting of a false recording insulting the Prophet Mohammed and attributed to a Druze clerick, Marwan Kiwan. From a polemic on social networks, the situation quickly evolved into a sectarian and xenophobic riot at Homs University, initiated by petro-engineering student Abbas Al-Khaswani, who had taken part in the bloody offensive against the Alawite community the previous month. This student was filmed delivering a hate speech against the Druze, Alawites and Kurds, followed by a mob of students circulating around the university grounds, randomly attacking seemingly non-Muslim students. The transitional government initially thanked the rioters for their religious zeal in defense of the Prophet, before timidly denying the authenticity of the audio recording. In the 48 hours that followed, armed groups stormed the predominantly Druze (and Christian) towns of Jaramana, Sahnaya and Ashrafiyet-Sahnaya, although it is not clear who these groups were composed of. However, a number of corroborating sources point the finger at networks of Bedouins and Islamist fighters from Deir Ez-Zor, Dera’a and Ghouta. In response, Druze factions in Suwayda mobilized and a convoy set off on the road to Damascus to support local factions in Sahnaya. The convoy was then ambushed, resulting in the death of more than forty Druze fighters, before a further ten villages in the Suwayda region were attacked for three days by groups from Dera’a and the region’s Bedouin tribes. General Security finally deployed its forces all around the governorate to prevent further groups from entering from Dera’a, but this stranglehold on the region was accompanied by pressure on Druze leaders to agree to the disarmament of factions and the entry of General Security forces into Suwayda, which was refused. In exchange, an agreement was reached on the activation of the police and General Security in the governorate, on the sole condition that all its members be from the region. When General Security withdrew from the only village it had occupied, residents found their homes and holy places burnt and looted. Two days after the end of hostilities, dozens of Suwayda students left their universities in Damascus and Homs, while the road to Damascus remains threatened by armed groups who have fired on vehicles and placed a checkpoint under their control, while General Security seemed powerless or complicit. At the same time, the transitional government has surprisingly appointed three Bedouin tribal leaders from Deir Ez-Zor to head the intelligence, anti-corruption and supreme council of Syrian tribes and clans[19]. It’s legitimate to wonder whether this is voluntary gratification or the result of blackmail and pressure tactics exerted by the powerful Bedouin tribes of the Al-Uqaydat confederation to reclaim a slice of the cake.

What these events say about Syria today is that you can’t remain President of Syria without, on the one hand, exacerbating intra-community prejudices and tensions in order to retain control over the regions, and, on the other, being endorsed by the country’s most reactionary forces and their allies abroad. It also demonstrates that Syrian society has not yet healed, nor is it likely to do so in the near future, from the diseases of sectarianism and the clanism that goes with it. After decades of intellectual regression and depoliticization accomplished with the whip of the Ba’ath’s national socialism, Syria has gradually returned to its pre-existing tribal and feudal reflexes. In this fertile breeding ground, the Islamic model – which rejects secularism, democracy and popular representation – once again gives free reign to the heads of large families (sheikhs), warlords and other Emirs, whose ability to impose a balance of power will determine their proximity to this power and their legitimacy in sharing its usufruct. Al-Sharaa’s own seizure of power demonstrated that all it takes to be legitimate is to be the strongest. And whoever can demonstrate military strength as well as loyalty will be duly thanked. This is what the leaders of the armed groups who fought for the fall of the regime have obtained, and who have agreed to dissolve their groups within the national army. It’s also what the Al-Uqaydat confederation may have just obtained, after responding to the call to teach the “heretics” of Suwayda a lesson, while agreeing to withdraw once the government had obtained an initial compromise from the Druze leaders.

The virile, archaic adventure of crossing the desert to subjugate unsubmissive neighbors in order to demonstrate allegiance to the sultan and his pashas reflects a return to the feudal model that preceded the French colonial mandate. What distinguishes it, and gives the current situation an all the more terrifying dimension, is the persistence of the racist and genocidal dehumanization practices introduced by the Western colonialists, adapted to the local context by the jihadists[20] since the 1980s and brought to a climax by the Assad dictatorship. Perhaps the most notable expression of these new modes of virilist terror is the filming of Alawite men barking while Druze men have their moustaches shaved, before taking them away in shackles to an unknown destination. In truth, there is nothing to distinguish this racist practice from that of Israeli soldiers against Palestinian Arabs, which reinforces the idea that it is indeed an import from the West. Thus, a significant part of the younger generation of Sunni Muslims who did not participate in the 2011 revolution but grew up during the civil war seem to be following a similar path of fascization to that of Bashar’s shabiha[21], notably by flooding news feeds and social networks with sectarian publications and comments advocating revenge and murder in the name of defending their allegedly threatened ethno-confessional identity. The paranoid logic of believing that everyone around you wants to destroy you naturally induces a reflex of withdrawal into oneself and around the charismatic leader who is supposed to guarantee your protection. So it’s not surprising to see Al-Sharaa presented by Sunni Muslims – especially the younger ones – as the providential hero of a revolution carried out exclusively by and for their community, while other communities are denied their participation in the revolution against Assad. The Revolution of all Syrians appears to have been hijacked by apologetic and mystical discourses presenting HTS’s seizure of power as a divine achievement, likened to the return of the Umayyads for some, or the Ottomans for others.  It’s the Ummah rewarded. We shouldn’t be surprised, therefore, that Al-Sharaa celebrated its victory at the Umayyad Mosque, and that old takfirist Imams such as Sheikh Adnan al-Arur – who is known for systematically peppering his sermons with interfaith hatred – are invited back to Syria after years of exile and welcomed there as masterminds of a Sunni revolution that would have prevailed over “45 years of minority rule[22]”. Meanwhile, in the shadows, a majority of moderate, progressive and pacifist Sunni Muslim Syrians – including the federalist Kurds – are once again essentialized by the extremism of a minority that agitates in the spotlight, and holds power by force of arms.

The ultra-confessional interpretation of social and political relations by fundamentalist clerics, to which members of the government and their supporters continue to belong, leads to dangerous simplifications that result in the Assad family being absolved of responsibility for its dictatorship by an entire community, the Alawites, or even all the minorities associated with them: Shi’ites, Druze, Ismailis or even the Murshidis[23], of whom hardly anyone ever hears, but of whom a dozen members have been executed since December by “unidentified individuals” in Latakia, Hama and Homs.  Similarly, several hundred civilians, including children and women, have been murdered since the fall of the regime, particularly in the Homs countryside where some villages have seen several of their residents executed on the same day by armed groups intervening as part of or alongside the “security operations” carried out by General Security[24]. So it’s not a revolution that has been taking place in Syria since December 2024, but the revenge of 50 – 60% of Syrians against everyone else. As a result, we can better understand the new authority’s reluctance to implement the transitional justice mechanisms needed to complete the revolution: not only is this not a priority, since it would highlight the persecution of all communities without exception, but also because it would lead to many of the new authority’s representatives themselves being incriminated and prosecuted for their crimes [25].

No transitional justice, no peace

The demand for justice was pounded out by the collectives of families of the disappeared from the very first hours after the fall of the regime, when the world was pretending to discover for the first time the extent of the horror it had represented. Syrian society, which has suffered violence without being in a position to inflict it, is unanimous: no social peace or regime that respects Syrians can exist without transitional justice. If Syrian communities are to heal from half a century of dictatorship and live together once again, the representatives of the new government have no choice but to arrest as quickly as possible all the dignitaries of the regime and all those who actively participated in the disappearance, torture and murder of tens of thousands of Syrians. Obviously, when we refer to justice, we’re not speaking of summary executions, show trials, closed-door hearings and public killings that reproduce the traumas generated by Takfirist barbarism, but of transparent justice that respects the fundamental principles of the right to defense and the dignity of the accused. Avenging blood and humiliation with blood and humiliation is not what Syrian society needs. On the contrary, in order to regenerate itself and emerge from the cycle of violence, it needs to demonstrate fairness and integrity, but also severity, towards those who have shown nothing but sadism and cruelty towards it. The objective must remain resilience, not the mere primary satisfaction of revenge instincts.

It is also clear that the systematic prosecution of all members of the deposed regime’s army and militias is not possible and would be an extremely dangerous undertaking, leading to large-scale purges and endless settling of scores. A very instructive interview with the Director of the Syrian National Network for Human Rights, Fadel Abdul Ghani, published by the Syrian media Enab Baladi[26], describes the transitional justice process that could potentially be implemented in Syria. In it, Abdul Ghani distinguishes between a judicial component and a civil component, the latter taking the form of “Truth and Reconciliation” commissions. He estimates the number of perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to the former regime at 16,200, 90% of whom would be military personnel, and considers that only first- and second-rank army officers could be concerned by criminal proceedings, while third- to sixth-rank officers would be included in the program of reconciliation commissions. Non-military officials, including businessmen, would not be exempt from prosecution.

It is currently impossible to know whether this coherent framework has been accepted and implemented by the new authorities. Beyond the brief communication from the Ministry of the Interior on its Telegram feed at the time of their arrest, there is no transparent mechanism for determining the fate of those under investigation. No special court has been mentioned, nor any judicial deadline. For the past four months, the self-proclaimed government has shown a deplorable lack of commitment to this issue, and the impunity enjoyed by some of the former regime’s high-ranking criminals is helping to erode Syrians’ confidence. The diplomatic evacuation of the Assad clan to Russia and the United Arab Emirates was already a first betrayal of the Syrians and the Revolution. The appointment of a whole series of takfirists and war criminals to positions of responsibility, while promising foreign takfirists access to citizenship, was a second.

Beyond these highly flawed decisions taken in the name of short-term stability, the new authority has also arrested a number of notorious criminals from the former regime, only to release them due to “lack of evidence”, “ regularizing” their situation or even granting them outright amnesty. The best example is undoubtedly that of the Commander-in-Chief of the National Defense Forces (Quwat ad-Difa’a al-Watani), Fadi Ahmad aka “Fadi Saqr”, who is directly responsible for numerous massacres, the best known of which is that of Tadamon in April 2013, or that of Talal Shafik Makhlouf, Commander-in-Chief of the Republican Guard and Director of the Office of the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Armed Forces, responsible for the murders of numerous demonstrators during the peaceful protests in Douma, Harasta, Nawa and Dera’a in 2011. To these can be added the cases of Mohammad Ghazi al-Jalali, former Minister of Communications and then Prime Minister, and Mohammad al-Shaar, former Minister of Interior[27], as well as a number of other high-ranking figures in the repressive apparatus of the Assad regime, who have since benefited from so-called “regularization” measures in exchange for their collaboration. Thus, on February 7, 2025, the residents of Tadamon reacted angrily to Fadi Saqr’s visit to the scene of his own crimes in the company of General Security officials, with the stated aim of “coming clean” by denouncing his former accomplices[28].  Two months later, the authorities were conspicuous by their absence from the commemoration of the April 16 massacre, while no security perimeter or forensic investigation of any significance has been set up on the block of buildings that served for several years as the National Defense’s “execution zone”, and where mass graves still undoubtedly exist. On the contrary, Fadi Saqr was appointed to head a reconciliation commission sent to the Syrian coast following the massacres of early March, a position from which he negotiated the release of former Assad regime officers arrested on that occasion. To say the least, empathy and consideration for the trauma of victims and survivors are not hallmarks of the new authorities. More recently, other notorious servants of the ousted regime have continued to make public appearances and use their privileged social position, even ostentatiously appearing alongside representatives of the new authorities[29].

Finally, and perhaps most disturbingly, the new authorities ostensibly disregarded the file on prisoners and the disappeared[30], leaving families without support or answers[31], while neglecting for many weeks to protect the archives of over 800 security services and places of detention, before finally deciding to partially restrict public access[32]. The al-Marjeh square in Damascus, where relatives of the disappeared used to meet in the weeks following the fall of the regime to support each other and gather information, was suddenly cleared of hundreds of photos of the disappeared in January as part of a vast clean-up campaign initiated by the Civil Defense and entitled “Damascus, we’re back”, while a collective called ‘The Hands of Mercy’ caused a scandal by covering the inscriptions left by inmates on the walls of a prison with paintings in praise of the revolution, with the prior approval of the authorities. The indifference and negligence of the latter, or even their eagerness to wipe the slate clean, is not reassuring, even if the most optimistic find good reason to persuade themselves that it’s normal and natural for things to take time, that the authorities are doing their best or that the processes underway offer encouraging signs. With five months to go since the fall of the regime, this persistence in relativism and lack of critical judgment regarding the carelessness, but also the nature and liabilities of most of the representatives of the new state apparatus, has become almost naïve and reckless. As for the relatives of victims and missing persons, they continue to be animated by the same hope that has enabled them to survive all these years. Nothing is really being done, in action or in words, to enable them to find peace.

Syria, a deprived society in the grip of Islamist neo-conservatism

The disastrous state in which Assad has left the country testifies not only to the incredible resistance and resilience of the Syrian people, but also to the inestimable capacity of human beings to survive in the most abominable circumstances. When we look at the Syrian economy, we realize just how devastated the country is and how much its infrastructure has been destroyed. And when we say destroyed, the word is inadequate: Syria is a hollowed-out, rusting wreck whose skeleton was already beginning to be eaten away before the fall of the regime. The regime’s soldiers were selling furniture and looted goods to feed themselves, and when the end came, they didn’t even wait for the enemy to approach before abandoning their weapons and uniforms, while the population was already rushing into all public buildings to loot absolutely everything they could. What’s most astonishing about the Syria afterwards is the absolutist nature of the looting: it’s not just the furniture that’s been taken away, but also the cables, pipes, doors, windows, tiles and bricks that have been ripped out, and now also the metal beams, bricks and breeze-blocks that make up the very structure of the buildings. Let’s not even mention vehicles (including tanks) and trees, which have been methodically removed or chopped up, transforming the entire public domain into a wild wasteland. And if you look closely at the cities and districts razed to the ground by the bombs, you’ll see that every single building in ruins has been absolutely stripped of every single small object, as if every single one of the thousands of apartments demolished in this way had been conscientiously purged of everything it contained. This was carried out by the regime’s own agents and soldiers, as certain districts were off-limits until the fall of Assad. Between Damascus and the governorate of Suwayda, the looters went so far as to knock down high-voltage pylons, cutting them up and severing the power cables that supply thousands of homes with electricity. Everywhere, it’s hallali[33] and the smallest piece of the beast has a value.

Looting is one of the main afflictions plaguing the new Syria. The phenomenon existed before the fall of the regime and cannot be blamed on the new authorities, although it has only increased and absolutely nothing seems to have been done to put a stop to it or to protect the infrastructure. The only progress that could put an end to this self-sabotage by the Syrian population itself is the restoration of a stable economy, or at least a perceptible improvement in it. Yet it seems that the Syrian Central Bank has decided to apply a risky method, restricting liquidity[34] while refusing to intervene on the exchange rate[35] and curb illegal speculation on the Syrian pound, resulting in intense exchange rate volatility and considerable money losses for Syrians, in a country where 90% of the inhabitants continue to live below the poverty line.  The main beneficiaries are speculators, while neither local investment and production nor exports have increased. The government does not print new currency, nor does it intervene to limit currency exchange to official exchange offices, with hundreds of small traders resorting to this activity to make a profit. Meanwhile, markets have begun to be flooded with low-priced products from Turkey and elsewhere, threatening the already fragile local production[36], while Syrians’ incomes have not seen any significant rise and the unemployment rate exceeds 25%. The new government seems to be relying exclusively on foreign investment. The current situation therefore foreshadows the capitalist predation to come, and with it another form of widespread looting, which will benefit speculators rather than the mass of Syrians. The pattern is well known: just look at the situation in Lebanon and Greece.

From this opportunistic perspective, international diplomacy did not wait two weeks to resume its normal course, as capitalist predators from the Arabian Peninsula and Europe were the first to flock to the presidential palace in Damascus with a view to restoring economic relations with Syria as quickly as possible and making the greatest possible profit from the new regional situation. On December 23, 2024, Qatar was the first foreign state after Turqui[37] to send a delegation to Syria to meet the new Syrian authorities, while Al-Sharaa made his first foreign visit on February 2, 2025, with a much-publicized trip to Saudi Arabia, during which he visited Mecca and introduced his partner Latifa al-Droubi to the world, before flying directly to Turkey[38].  Beyond the show, these visits testify to the desire to place Saudi Arabia and Qatar at the forefront of Syrian foreign policy. The two states plan to take back control of the energy sector by reviving electricity production fuelled almost exclusively by fossil fuels from the Gulf. That’s going to burn lots of gas[39]. Both began by delivering tons of humanitarian aid to Syria the day after their first official meetings, and also pledged to pay Syria’s $15 million debt to the World Bank, which foreshadows major investments: nothing is free. Germany and France were then the first European states to show up at the ex-jihadist’s door on January 3, 2025[40], followed by Italy on the following January 10, the three countries having been the main beneficiaries of Syrian oil exports[41] on the eve of the 2011 revolution.  They were also the first to implement the suspension of asylum procedures for Syrians the day after the fall of the regime, and to advocate the lifting of sanctions against Syria, while France was the first European country to welcome Al-Sharaa on May 7, 2025, despite his continued blacklisting as a terrorist suspect. For Macron, the state of exception is a mode of government, and signing juicy contracts is worth turning a blind eye to the suffering of the Syrian people. All that al-Sharaa has been asked to do is to make a few symbolic statements in favor of the protection of human rights and justice. But like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a declaration is not binding and remains a mere promise whose primary aim is to buy social peace, and to deceive the most credulous liberals. Syria’s economic partners will never bother to make the restoration of trade relations conditional on the strict implementation, under international supervision, of a democratic system representative of Syria’s diversity, and of transitional justice excluding the death penalty and inhuman and degrading treatment. Instead, as mentioned earlier, we’ll just demand an oral commitment from Al-Sharaa to “protect minorities” and “neutralize the Islamic State”, as has already been the case for a decade with Bashar al-Assad. No big deal.

In the capitalist system, it’s all about deals and compromises. The conclusions of the commission of inquiry into the massacres on the Syrian coast can wait a few more months, until the sanctions against Syria are lifted and al-Sharaa can quietly retract its promises once international trade is restored. We are currently witnessing a historic transition towards a fusion of economic liberalism and societal conservatism, such as occurred in the United States under George Bush and his son George W. Bush, but in its Islamic version already in power in Saudi Arabia. So we shouldn’t be surprised if Syria’s fate depends on the relationship between Ahmed al-Sharaa, Donald Trump and Mohammed Ben Salman. Our article is timely, as all three are scheduled to meet in Saudi Arabia in a few days’ time…

Sharia is capitalism-compatible, and so is Ahmed al-Sharaa.


NOTES:

[1]  Maher Alloush (1976, Homs), writer and researcher specializing in political, social and economic issues, as well as Transitional Justice, Hassan al-Daghim (1976, Idleb), graduate in Islamic studies and comparative jurisprudence, Mohammed Mustat (1985, Aleppo), graduate in electronic engineering, political science and Islamic studies, Youssef al-Hijar, Mustafa al-Moussa, pharmacist and member of HTS, Hind Kabawat (1974, India), Master’s degree in Law and International Relations and Houda Atassi, civil engineer with degrees in Architecture and Information Technology.

[2] Abdul Hamid al-Awak, PhD in Constitutional Law; Yasser al-Huwaish, recently appointed Dean of the Faculty of Law at Damascus University; Ismail al-Khalfan, PhD in International Law; Mohammad Reda Jalkhi, PhD in International Law; Bahia Mardini, the only female journalist with a PhD in Law.

[3] Anas Khattab (1987, Rif Dimashq), Minister of Interior; Murhaf Abu Qasra (1984, Hama), Minister of Defense; Asaad al-Shaibani (1987, Al-Hasakeh), Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates; Mazhar al-Wais (1980, Deir Ez-Zor), Minister of Justice; Mohammed Abu al-Khair Shukri (1961, Damascus), Minister of Awqaf; Marwan al-Halabi (1964, Quneitra), Minister of Higher Education; Hind Kabawat (1974, India), the only woman, Minister of Social Affairs and Labor; Mohammed al-Bashir (1984, Idleb), Minister of Energy; Mohammed Yisr Barnieh, Minister of Finance; Mohammad Nidal al-Shaar (1956, Aleppo), Minister of Economy and Industry; Musaab Nazzal al-Ali (1985, Deir Ez-Zor), Minister of Health; Mohammed Anjrani (1992, Aleppo), Minister of Local Administration and Environment; Raed al-Saleh (1983, Idleb), Minister of Emergency and Disaster Management; Abdul Salam Haykal (1978, Damascus), Minister of Communications and Information Technology; Amjad Badr (1969, As-Suwayda), Minister of Agriculture and Land Reform; Mohammed Abdul Rahman Turko (1979, Afrin), Minister of Education; Mustafa Abdul Razzaq (1989), Minister of Public Works and Housing; Mohammed Yassin Saleh (1985), Minister of Culture; Mohammed Sameh Hamedh (1976, Idleb), Minister of Youth and Sports; Mazen al-Salhani (1979, Damascus), Minister of Tourism; Mohammad Skaf (1990), Minister of Administrative Development; Yaarub Bader (1959, Latakia), Minister of Transport; Hamza al-Mustafa, Minister of Information.

[4] Except by proxies.

[5] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/deal-for-joint-military-action-with-us-in-syria-could-elevate-russia-as-well-as-defeat-isis-a7237256.html

[6] https://www.middleeasteye.net/fr/news/russia-and-turkey-agree-deal-coordinate-strikes-syria-1427197601

[7] https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/jordan-and-the-us-russia-deal-in-southern-syria/

[8] https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/PoliticalStudies/Pages/Israel-Reacts-to-US-Russian-De-Escalation-Agreement-in-Syria.aspx

[9] See the history of Ahmad Al-Awda’s 8th Brigade – https://middleeastdirections.eu/new-publication-med-the-eighth-brigade-striving-for-supremacy-in-southern-syria-al-jabassini/

[10] He is currently still in charge.

[11] Between 4356 and 6456 civilians killed according to airwars.org; 8763 civilians killed according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

[12] Zahran Alloush (founder of Liwa al-Islam in September 2011, which became Jaysh al-Islam in 2013); Ahmad Issa al-Sheikh (founder of Suqour al-Sham in September 2011); Abu Khalid al-Suri and Hassan Aboud (founders of Ahrar al-Sham December in 2011).

[13] Anas Hassan Khattab is also said to be a liaison officer for the Turkish intelligence service (MIT). He is believed to be operating under the control of MIT officer Kemal Eskintan, known to jihadists under the pseudonym Abu Furqan, himself under the orders of Hakan Fidan, then Ibrahim Kalin, heads of Turkish intelligence from 2010 to 2023 and since 2023. After 15 years of close collaboration, Ibrahim Kalin and Hakan Fidan were the first foreign officials to visit Damascus after the fall of the Assad regime. The former was seen praying with Al-Sharaa at the Umayyad Mosque on December 12, 2024, while the latter celebrated Turkey’s victory with Al-Sharaa on the heights of Qassiun on December 22, 2024.

[14] Opposition leaders present in Astana include Mohammed Alloush (Jaysh al-Islam – Army of Islam), Fares Al-Bayoush (Jaysh Idleb al-Harr – Free Army of Idleb), Nasser al-Hariri (Syrian National Coalition of Opposition Forces and the Syrian Revolution), Abu Osama Joulani (Southern Front, made up of 58 rebel factions). Eleven other groups are taking part in the negotiations.

[15] Abdul Rahman Hussein al-Khatib a.k.a. ” Abu Hussein al-Urduni ” (Jordanian, General de brigade) ; Omar Mohammed Jaftashi a.k.a. ” Mukhtar al-Turki ” (Turc, General de brigade) ; Abd al-Aziz Daud Khudaberdi a.k.a. ” Abu Mohammed al-Turkistani ” ou ” Zahid ” (Chinese ouïghur, General de brigade) ; Abdel Samriz Jashari  a.k.a. ” Abu Qatada al-Albani ” (Albanais, colonel) ; Alaa Muhammad Abdul Baqi (Egyptian, colonel) ; Moulan Tarson Abdul Samad (Tadjik, colonel) ; Ibn Ahmad al-Hariri (Jordanian, colonel) ; Abdulsalam Yasin Ahmad (Chinois Ouïghur, colonel) …

[16] The leaders of these groups are, respectively, former Assad Republican Guard commander Moqdad Fteha, former head of the Syrian Arab Army’s 4th Armored Division Ghiath Dalla and Mundir W.

[17] Realizing the scale of voluntary participation in the offensive – and no doubt the genocidal chaos that ensued from the very first hours of clashes – the Authorities subsequently announced that this support was no longer necessary.

[18] Figures vary according to the two main sources: Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) and Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR).

[19] Hussein al-Salama as head of intelligence, replacing Anas Khattab, Amer Names al-‘Ali as chairman of the Central Control and Inspection Authority (anti-corruption) and Sheikh Rami Shahir al-Saleh al-Dosh as head of the Supreme Council of Tribes and Clans. All three hail from the town of Al-Shuhayl in the governorate of Deir Ez Zor, which has a population of less than 15,000.

[20] Which are nothing other than an Arab-Muslim version of European fascism.

[21] The chabiha are the regime’s supporters, henchmen and mercenaries, most of whom have been integrated into the National Defense Forces and other paramilitary groups.

[22] In the words of Syria’s new Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani during his speech at the 9th Donors for Syria Conference in Brussels on March 17, 2025.

[23] The Murshidis are a recent religion founded in 1923 in the Latakia region by Salman al-Murshid. This religion derives from Alawism, and its members exist only in Syria, where they are estimated to number between 300,000 and 500,000.

[24] See our mapping of incidents listed by the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights on the home page of our website: https://interstices-fajawat.org/fr/accueil/

[25] As is already the case for the Jaysh al-Islam faction, whose members Majdi Nema aka Islam Alloush and Essam Al-Buwaydani aka Abu Hammam were arrested and prosecuted in international legal proceedings before being granted diplomatic immunity.

[26] https://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2025/02/transitional-justice-in-syria-steps-to-diffuse-tension/

[27]  https://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2025/02/former-syrian-interior-minister-mohammad-al-shaar-surrenders-to-authorities/

[28] In the wake of this controversial visit, General Security quietly arrested the commander of the local branch of the National Defense Forces, Ghadeer Salem, then – with more media noise – three of his subordinates, Mundhir Al-Jaza’iri, Somar Mohammed Al-Mahmoud and Imad Mohammed Al-Mahmoud.

[29] These include : Farhan al-Marsumi, chief of a Bedouin tribe in Deir Ez Zor, actively involved in drug trafficking to Iraq in collaboration with Maher al-Assad’s 4th Division and Iranian militias; Agnès Mariam de la Croix, Mother Superior of the Carmelite monastery of “Saint-Jacques le Mutilé” in Homs, an accomplice and active propagandist for the Assad regime; Dr. Tammam Al Yousef, cardiac surgeon and brother of Brigadier General Ali Mu’iz al-Din Youssef al-Khatib, head of the Idleb air force intelligence service, suspected of corruption and embezzlement in cooperation with the Assad regime; Safwan Khair Beyk aka “Safwan Shafiq Jaafar”, mafia boss from Jableh and leader of the National Defense Forces, linked to the Assad family through Bashar al-Assad’s cousins, Mundhir al-Assad and Ayman Jaber – Source: Zaman al-Wasl – https://www.zamanalwsl.net/

[30] The number of missing is estimated between 96,000 and 158,000, including enforced disappearances attributed to the Assad regime, the Islamic State, the Syrian Democratic Forces, armed opposition factions, the Syrian National Army and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.

[31] It was only through public appearances and rallies in the three months following the fall of the regime that the families of the disappeared represented by The Syria Campaign obtained an appointment with Al-Sharaa in February 2025 – https://diary.thesyriacampaign.org/my-father-is-still-missing-join-wafas-struggle-to-uncover-the-truth-about-syrias-disappeared/

[32] As early as December 20, 2024, the Association of Detainees and Missing Persons in Sednaya Prison (ADMSP), Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Independent International Commission of Inquiry set up by the UN Human Rights Council urged the transitional government to take steps to protect the archives and evidence of mass atrocities – https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/syria-preserve-evidence-mass-atrocities-enar

[33] The hallali is the decisive moment in hunting when the impatient or excited herd of hounds rushes to the exhausted prey to put an end to the hunt.

[34] Withdrawals from ATMs have been frozen, while a large number of civil servants are no longer receiving their salaries.

[35] The exchange rate fluctuated between 10,000 and 12,000 pounds per dollar during the first four months of 2025, compared to a rate of 14,750 pounds before the fall of the regime, 15,000 the day after and an exceptional drop to 8,000 at the beginning of February – ttps://www.sp-today.com/en/currency/us_dollar/city/damascus

[36] https://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2025/02/turkish-goods-undermine-local-products-in-syria

[37] The Turkish embassy in Damascus reopened on December 14 after a 12-year interruption in diplomatic relations, and its foreign minister, Hakan Fidan, officially visited Al-Sharaa on December 22, on the eve of Qatar’s visit.

[38] Syria’s relationship with Turkey must be distinguished from its relationship with Qatar and Saudi Arabia. While the former is characterized more by a form of military and strategic dependence, implying a form of colonial extension and Turkish security hold over Syria, the latter is primarily economic.

[39] The Deir Ali power plant is expected to generate 400 megawatts daily by burning natural gas supplied by Qatar via Jordan.

[40] Ahmad al-Sharaa remains on the international terrorism list with his war name of “Abu Mohammed al-Jawlani”, but the promise of a $10 million reward for his capture has been revoked by the USA.

[41] The main importers of Syrian crude oil in 2010 were Germany (32%), Italy (31%), France (11%), the Netherlands (9%), Austria (7%), Spain (5%) and Turkey (5%).

What’s behind the sectarian violence against the Druze in Syria ? – May 2025

Over the past week, Syria’s Druze community has suffered an unprecedented attack by sectarian and Islamist armed groups, with the passive support of the new government in Damascus.

We are currently in Syria, close to the events. Here is our description and analysis.

APRIL 27

A fake record circulated on social media, in which a non-identified voice is heard insulting the prophet Muhammad, provoking sectarian riots by Islamists in the University of Homs, led by the petrol-engeneering student Abbas Al-Khaswani.

This Islamist agitator was giving a hateful speech targeting several religious communities including the Druze, the Alawi and the Kurds. Following this speech, tens of people chanting sectarian and hateful slogans were demonstrating in the University compound and assaulting non-muslim students.

The old Druze sheikh Marwan Kiwan accused of being the author of the record soon denied this accusation. It is reminded that Muhammad is not only a prophet for sunni muslims, but also for the Druze.

The non-elected authority in Damascus published a weak press release in which it thanked the rioters for their efforts to defend their prophet, instead of holding them accountable for the dangerous unrest they provoked.

Abbas Al-Khaswani is not a student in Islamic studies and was identified as one of the armed perpetrators in the attacks on the Syrian coast two months earlier. He was not arrested and went back the next days to the university where he and his colleagues threatened the lives of other students.

APRIL 29

The authenticity of the record that sparked racist and sectarian riots two days earlier was denied by the Syrian Minister of Interior, but the General Security did not do anything to prevent the unfolding events.

Thus, armed groups of unknown origin attacked the town of Jaramana, targeting its residents and druze local self-defense factions.

The General Security intervened and were allegedly targeted by the local factions, while the difference between the early attackers and the newcoming members of the General Security remains unclear. Locals identified the unknown attackers as tribal factions from the Al-Uqaydat tribe of Deir Ez-Zor.

17 SYRIANS WERE KILLED, most of them from the attackers. All of them are then presented as members of the General Security while the local factions were presented as responsible for the clashes.

It is vital to remember that Jaramana IS NOT a Druze Only neighborhood, but rather, it represents the diversity of the Syrian social fabric, including refugees from Palestine and Iraq.

APRIL 30

Following a similar scenario as in Jaramana, armed islamist groups from Dera’a, Deir Ez Zor and Ghouta attacked the towns of Sahnaya and Ashrafiyeh-Sehnaya, targeting its residents and the Druze local self-defense factions.

45 SYRIANS WERE KILLED, most of them from the Druze community, including 10 field executions of civilians. Among them was the mayor of the city Hussam Warwar with his son Haider. He was seen welcoming the General Security forces hours before his assassination.

It is vital to remember that Sahnaya and Ashrafiyeh-Sehnaya ARE NOT a Druze only neighborhoods.

On the other hand, Druze factions from Suwayda left the governorate to rescue their community under attack in Sahnaya and Ashrafiyeh, but they were ambushed next to Braq on the Damascus road by mixed groups of local tribes, Islamists from Dera’a and Deir Ez Zor, but also elements of the General Security. There is a video showing them clearly opening fire while standing side by side.

42 SYRIANS WERE KILLED, most of them from the Druze factions, the community of Salkhad being particularly impacted, with 11 martyrs from the Quwaat Al-Alya’ and Quwaat Sheikh al-Karami self-defense factions, including their leader Amjad Baali.

MAY 1st

During the night, armed groups of unknown origin attacked the towns of As-Sawara al-Kabira, Al-Thala, Ad-Dour, ‘Ira, Kanaker and Rsas, leading to heavy clashes with local self-defense factions and shelling of civilian houses.

All the Suwayda factions composed of more than 80 000 fighters were put on high alert and spreaded to all the strategic points of the governorate.

In the evening, the General Security surrounded the governorate, allegedly to prevent any further attacks from Dera’a. However, several armed groups attacked the towns of Lebbin, Harran, Ad-Dour and Jreen, where they were met with strong resistance that left most of the attackers dead. The number of casualties is unknown, but the attackers were identified as belonging to the local tribes.

All the Druze community leaders were put under pressure by the central authority in Damascus to agree on the disarmament of the local factions, unfairly accused of being responsible for the unrest. In the night, the Druze leadership issued a statement to inform about the agreement that was met, but it stayed unclear until the next day, with contradictory and fake information being spread.

Israel used the situation to threaten Syria and bombed the presidential palace in Damascus, allegedly to “warn” Syrian authority over the threats to the Druze.

MAY 2 to 4

On May 2nd, an Israeli drone was flying above Suwayda and targeted a farm in Kanaker, killing 4 of its Druze residents. One of them, Issam Azam, who was known to be an active supporter of the protests in Karami square against the Assad regime. In the following night, Israeli planes launched series of strikes on military sites in Dera’a, Damascus and Hama.

On May 3rd, Khaldun Sayah Al-Mhithawi, a Druze lawyer involved in negotiating the release of another lawyer who was kidnapped north of Suwayda, was assassinated in Aqraba, located next to Jaramana. The same day, the 11 martyrs from Salkhad were buried following a ceremony gathering thousands of mourners in their hometown, with the presence of the prince Hassan al-Atrash and Aqel Sheikh Hammoud al-Hennawi.

On May 4th, the Druze leadership issued a five-point statement providing for the activation of the police and general security in Suwayda governorate, on a condition that its members are all from the region, as well as securing the road to Damascus plus a ceasefire in all areas affected by the clashes of recent days.

Laith Al-Balous, the leader of the “Madhafet al-Karami” faction, who was actively involved in negotiating the entrance of the General Security into Suwayda governorate, was pushed out of his town of Mazra’a by its residents after he provided access to several General Security vehicles.

MAY 5th

At day, clashes between local tribes and Druze factions were still ongoing in the vicinity of al-Thala and Harran in Suwayda.

After the withdrawal of the General Security from the town of As-Sawara al-Kabiri, the police of Suwayda entered the town with the governor Mustafa Bakkur and found several houses burnt and looted, as well as the Druze shrine of the village.

It is notable that the only town where homes were looted and vandalized in Suwayda is also the only one where General Security forces were deployed.

At the same time, rumors circulated that Druze factions were threatening mosques, when in fact they had been deployed to protect Muslim religious sites. Several imams from the region and representatives of local Bedouin tribes denied these rumors of sectarian threats by the Druze towards Muslims, reaffirming peaceful coexistence within the governorate and the need to tackle “fake news” and sectarian incitement on social media.

BULLET POINTS

 

– The recording that sparked the sectarian outrage was fake, and the person responsible for the racist riots at the University of Homs has not been arrested;

– The only offenders are armed groups with Salafist affiliations, but not at any moment they were named by the authorities, while their members who were killed in the clashes were not officially identified as the main offenders;

– The situation was either provoked or exploited by the central authority in Damascus to put pressure on the Druze community’s self-defense factions and justify their disarmament;

– Community leaders with authority over the tribes suspected of being behind the armed attacks have been rewarded with the highest positions of power in the new state apparatus;

– The authorities and the media have fostered or allowed a wave of sectarian hatred on social media, falsely accusing the victims of being responsible for the clashes plus of attacking General Security forces;

– The authorities have surrounded the Suwayda region, generating fear among its residents, while being unable to guarantee and restore the safety of users on the 110 road to Damascus;

– The majority of the population as well as the main factions in the Suwayda region – those that existed before the fall of the Assad regime and were legitimate among the revolutionary movement – reject Israel’s intervention and insist on unity with all other Syrians;

OUTCOMES

 

After a week of violence, the Damascus government continues to deny the existence and the identity of the armed groups responsible for the attacks on more than 10 Syrian towns and their inhabitants. All this, despite numerous sources indicating the involvement of some Bedouin tribes, as well as a group called “Burkan al-Furat” which is even bragging about the assault on its Telegram group.

One of the worrying outcomes of these three days is the appointment by Al-Sharaa of three members of the very influent Al-Uqaydat confederation of Bedouin tribes from Al-Shuhayl (Deir Ez-Zor), to positions of responsibility: Hussein al-Salama as head of intelligence, replacing Anas Khattab, Amer Names al-‘Ali as Chairman of the Central Monitoring and Inspection Authority (fight against corruption) and sheikh Rami Shahir al-Saleh al-Dosh as head of the Supreme Council of Tribes and Clans.

We can legitimately wonder whether the authority in Damascus has a free hand, or whether it is under pressure from the traditional power structures that have been destroying the lives of Syrians for half a century or more. The key question is: who benefits from the disarmament of the Druze community’s self-defense factions?

In Jaramana, the agreements included the progressive disarmament of the local factions, who have begun to hand over their heavy weapons. On the other hand, the armed groups that attacked them are not required to surrender their weapons…

The Druze of Lebanon and Syria, a long history of insubordination

The Druze are a religious community attached to a heterodox creed of Ismaili Shi’ite Islam, which originated in Egypt under the leadership of Imam Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad in the early 11th century. The Druze faith takes its name from the preacher Muhammad ad-Darazi, although some of his followers do not recognize Ad-Darazi and he was disowned by Hamza ibn Ali before being executed on the orders of the caliph Al-Hakim bi-amr Allah. The Druze prefer to define themselves as “Muwahideen” (Unitarians) or “Banu Ma’ruf” (Children of Maarouf), although the origin of this term remains uncertain.

The Druze religion, like Sufism, takes a philosophical and syncretic approach to faith, recognizing neither the rigid precepts nor the prophets of Islam. Although this belief spread to Cairo under the Fatimid caliphate of al-Hakim, who was deified by the Druze, it was soon persecuted by the rest of the Muslim community after al-Hakim’s death in 1021, and so the Druze were exiled to Bilad el-Cham (present-day Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Palestine), particularly to Mount Lebanon and the Hauran. But it was around the beginning of the 19th century that the Druze community in Hauran gained strength, after a large part of the community had been expelled from Mount Lebanon by the Ottoman authorities. The Hauran mountain was then named jebel al-Druze.

Today, Suwayda governorate is home to the majority of the world’s Druze community, some 700,000 people. The Lebanese Druze are the second largest community, numbering 250,000. In Syria, several Druze settlements also exist in Jebel al-Summaq (Idlib, 25,000 people), Jebel al-Sheikh and al-Juwlan (Quneitra, 30,000 people) and Jaramana (Damascus suburbs, 50,000 people). Finally, outside Syria and Lebanon, the largest Druze communities are to be found in occupied Palestine (Galilee and Mount Karmel, 130,000), Venezuela (100,000), Jordan (20,000), North America (30,000), Colombia (3,000) and Australia (3,000).

The main Druze families and clans in the 19th century

The Druze community is structured along traditional clan lines, with large families exerting a dominant influence. Until the mid-18th century, Hauran (or Jabal Druze) was dominated by the Hamdan family, whose hegemony was challenged in the 1850s by Al-Atrash family. The conflict between the two families and their respective allies between 1856 and 1870 was finally settled by the intervention of the Ottoman authorities, who divided the region into four sub-districts, the largest of which was that of Al-Atrash family, comprising 18 villages out of the 62 in Hauran at the time.

Zuqan al-Atrash

Rebellion against Turkish-Ottoman authority…

 

In 1878, the semi-autonomy acquired by the Hauran was called into question by Ottoman military intervention, which sought to put an end to the conflicts between the Druze and their neighbors in the plain (now Daraa). The Ottoman authorities imposed a new form of governance under the leadership of Ibrahim al-Atrash, and the payment of taxes to the Druze community, particularly to peasants. Between 1887 and 1910, a series of conflicts ensued, first between the region’s peasants and Al-Atrash family, then between Ibrahim’s brothers – Shibli and Yahia – and the Ottoman authorities. In 1909, the revolt against the Ottomans led by their nephew Zuqan al-Atrash failed at the battle of Al-Kefr, and he was executed the following year. His son Sultan took over at the time of the great Arab revolt of 1918…

During the 1914-1918 war, Ottoman rule left Jabal Druze relatively undisturbed. Sultan al-Atrash forged links with the pan-Arab movements involved in the great Arab revolt of the Hijaz (Saudi Arabia) and raised the Arab flag on the fortress of Salkhad, south of the Suwayda region, and on his house in Al-Qurayya. He sent a reinforcement of 1,000 fighters to Aqaba in 1917, then joined the revolt himself with 300 fighters at Bosra, before seizing Damascus on September 29, 1918. Sultan became a general in Emir Faisal’s army and Syria gained independence. This was short-lived, however, as Syria was occupied by the French in July 1920. Jabal Druze became one of the five states of the new French colony.

Sultan al-Atrash

Sultan al-Atrash

…then against French colonialism

 

Sultan al-Atrash first clashed with the French in 1922, when his host, Lebanese Shi’ite rebel leader Adham Khanjar, was arrested at his home in his absence. Sultan demanded his release, then attacked a French convoy believed to be carrying the prisoner. In retaliation for the attack, the French demolished his house and ordered his arrest, but Sultan took refuge in Jordan, from where he led raids against the French forces. Temporarily pardoned and allowed to return home, he led the Syrian revolt of 1925-1927, declaring revolution against the French occupiers. Initially victorious, the Great Syrian Revolt was finally defeated by the French army and Sultan was sentenced to death. He took refuge in Transjordan, before being pardoned again and invited to sign the Syrian Independence Treaty in 1937. He received a hero’s welcome in Syria, a reputation he retains to this day. When the treaty failed to secure Syria’s independence in May 1945, the Syrians once again revolted against the French occupiers, who sent in the army and killed around a thousand Syrians. In Hauran, the French army was defeated by the Druze under the command of Sultan al-Atrash, before the British intervention that put a definitive end to the French mandate on April 17, 1946.

Editor’s note: the commitment of the Al-Atrash family must be seen in the context of Arab conservatism and nationalism, which did not challenge traditional clan, patriarchal and authoritarian structures. However, their constant opposition since the 19th century to foreign imperialism and the abusive authority of central powers made them precursors in the anti-colonial struggles of the second third of the 20th century. Their struggle can also be seen as carrying within it the seeds of community struggles for autonomy and self-defence, which will be discussed in Suwayda in the recent period (years 2010-2020). Sultan al-Atrash is also known for his stance in favor of multiculturalism and secularism.

الدين لله، والوطن للجميع

Religion is for God, Homeland is for everyone

Resistance to Israeli colonialism

 

When the British transferred their domination of Palestine to Zionist settlers in Europe and America, and the latter began ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from December 18, 1947, Sultan al-Atrash called for the formation of the Arab Liberation Army of Palestine. Under the command of future Syrian president Adib Shishakli, this army entered Palestine from Syria on January 8, 1948, as part of the First Arab-Israeli War.

Kamal Jumblatt

Only a year apart, on May 1, 1949, Druze intellectual and political leader Kamal Jumblatt founded the Progressive Socialist Party, then he called for the first convention of Arab Socialist Parties in May 1951 and began to establish links with the Palestinian Left Resistance, embodied by the Fedayeen movement. Jumblatt then turned the PSP into an armed movement integrated into the Lebanese National Movement, a coalition of 12 left-wing parties and movements founded in 1969 to support the Palestine Liberation Organization, itself created five years earlier and then led by Yasser Arafat. Jumblatt is the leader of the Lebanese National Movement (LNM).

The entire period between 1952 and 1975 was characterized by growing sectarian tensions between secular left-wing movements – anti-imperialist and pro-Palestinian – and the pro-Western Christian Maronite elites, who dominated the Lebanese political landscape at the time. From 1970 onwards, these tensions were heightened by the significant increase in the number of Palestinian fighters in Lebanon, following their expulsion from Jordan, and leading to a considerable increase in the influence of Palestinian movements in the country. These tensions culminated in the massacres of Palestinian civilians by Christian Phalangists (Kataeb) at Ain el-Rummaneh on April 13, 1975 (30 dead) and at Karantina (between 1,000 and 1,500 dead), followed by the massacre of Christian civilians at Damour (150 to 580 dead) in January 1976.

Syrian President Hafez al-Assad – whose Ba’ath party had until then supported the Palestinian left and its allies – took up the cause of the Christian Falangists and proposed an agreement involving the reduction of Palestinian influence in Lebanon. The PLO refused, and in March 1976, Kamal Jumblatt went to Damascus to express his disagreement to Hafez al-Assad. The following month, the LNM and the PLO took control of 80% of Lebanon, but in June the Syrian army intervened in Lebanon. During the summer, the Christian militias who had been besieging the Palestinian camp of Tell al-Zaatar since the beginning of the year, massacred between 2,000 and 3,000 civilians with Syrian military support. At the end of a six-month confrontation with the PLO and the LNM, a temporary ceasefire was signed, establishing the long-term occupation of Lebanon by the Syrian army and leading to the gradual – then definitive ten years later (1987) – annihilation of the Palestinian Resistance in Lebanon.

On March 16, 1977, Kamal Jumblatt was assassinated by gunmen hired by Hafez al-Assad’s brother, Rifaat. Many left-wing personalities attended his funeral, and Yasser Arafat delivered a powerful eulogy for his ally and friend.

Excerpt from the film “Greetings to Kamal Jumblatt”, Maroun Bagdadi, 1977, 57 mm

Editor’s note: We are not here to idealize Kamal Jumblatt’s character, and we believe that leaders should never be heroes. However, we do not believe that Kamal Jumblatt is guilty of any crimes, nor that he has propagated feelings of hatred based on the ethnic or religious affiliation of his opponents, contrary to what has been conveyed by certain media affiliated to the Lebanese right. Nevertheless, it must be recognized that any armed movement has at one time or another been associated with or directly involved in the commission of crimes or acts of vengeance. This was notably the case with the Palestinian armed factions, and therefore their allies, as in Damour in January 1976. It’s also important to admit when a leader betrays the interests of his community, as in the case of Kamal Jumblatt’s son, Walid Jumblatt. His political choices following his father’s death and up to the present day are relatively dubious, and he does not seem to us to be worthy of his father’s political legacy.

Armed resistance to authoritarian centralism in Damascus

 

When the 2011 revolt against Bashar al-Assad broke out, Syria’s Druze joined the rest of the Syrian population in demonstrating in the streets of Suwayda and Jaramana, the Druze community district of Damascus.

And when the armed struggle took over from the peaceful demonstrations, Druze officer Khaldun Zein Ad-Din defected from the regime’s army on October 31, 2011. He publically declared his allegiance to the Free Syrian Army and created the “Sultan Basha al-Atrash” batallion, made up of 120 Druze fighters.

Khaldun Zein Ad-Din

Fadlallah Zein Ad-Din

He was joined by his brother Fadlallah Zein Ad-Din in July 2012. Denounced by informers, they are besieged and Khaldun is killed with 16 other of their companions in Tall al-Maseeh on January 13, 2013. His brother announced his death in a statement ten days later. The Progressive Socialist Party of Lebanon organized a ceremony in their honor, and he became the symbol of the revolutionary and opposition movement in Suwayda. On March 21, 2013, his wife Amira Abu Bahsas publicly declared that she too would join her late husband’s battalion, becoming the first woman from Suwayda to join the Free Syrian Army.

During anti-regime demonstrations in Suwayda between 2023 and 2025, Khaldun Zein Ad-Din’s portrait is displayed in Dignity Square, where his parents Sami and Siham actively participated in the protests.

Amira Abu Bahsas

Another form of resistance to Assad’s dictatorship emerged in 2013 in Suwayda, following the forced recruitment of several dozen young men from the region. An influential sheikh in the community, Waheed al-Balous, refused to accept the community’s participation in the war against other Syrians and opposed forced recruitment. He founded the Men of Dignity Movement (“Rijal al-Karami”), which gained in popularity over the years and prevented the conscription of between 30,000 and 50,000 young men from Suwayda.

دم السوري على السوري حرام

A Syrian must not shed the blood of another Syrian

In 2015, Balous openly denounced the dictatorship, leading to his assassination in a double bomb attack on September 4, 2015. On the evening of his death, riots broke out in the region and the statue of Hafez al-Assad that had stood in Dignity Square was removed. It was never replaced. His brother Raafat, wounded in the attack, temporarily replaced him before giving up his position. Waheed al-Balous’s sons, Laith and Fahd, created a splinter group from Rijal al-Karami, the Sheikhs of Dignity (Sheikh al-Karami), which they intended to be politically more radical than their father’s movement. Despite frequent disagreements, the two movements continued to carry out joint actions, even as Rijal al-Karami drew closer to another major faction, the Forces of the Mountain (Quwwat al-Jabal). In December 2024, they joined the Southern Room for Military Operations, which also included other Druze factions and took part in the liberation of Damascus.

Waheed al-Balous

Raafat al-Balous

Laith al-Balous

Fahd al-Balous

Editor’s note: While here too we must refrain from idealizing one faction or another, we nevertheless consider that Rijal al-Karami and associated groups have, in recent years, embodied the Druze community’s imperative for self-defense and self-determination. Whether in the face of attempts by the regime’s army to impose itself by force or coercion, in the face of Islamist aggression or in the face of the predation of the gangs that have proliferated in the region, these factions have succeeded in protecting the civilian population and the general interest without committing exactions or abuses of power. Their leaders have generally answered the call of threatened communities and taken a clear stand against any outside force threatening community security. They also acted as protectors of popular demonstrations and revolts, before spontaneously joining the offensive against the regime in December 2024.

Suwayda at the heart of the revolutionary path from 2011 to 2025

 

Beyond the few emblematic examples of armed resistance to the authoritarian centralism of Damascus, civil society in Suwayda has never ceased to take a critical or hostile stance towards central power and the Assad dictatorship. Contrary to unfounded rumors that regularly portray the Druze as loyal to the regime, numerous examples demonstrate that the community has always succeeded in reconciling its tradition of resistance with a refusal to take sides in a conflict that very early on became confessionalized – with a very large Islamic religious component within the Free Syrian Army as early as 2012 – and which would have resulted in its annihilation.

Few remember that the people of Suwayda were involved in the 2011 uprising right from the start. As mentioned in our first article, the Suwayda Lawyers’ Guild organized one of the first public demonstrations in March 2011, and as elsewhere in Syria, the Jabal Druze took to the streets in the weeks that followed. To give just a few strong and symbolic examples, let’s recall that one of the main songs of the revolution is “Ya Heif!” (يا حيف – “What a Shame!”), composed and sung by Druze singer Samih Choukheir (Listen by clicking here).

Samih Choukheir

At the beginning of this text, we also mentioned the influence of the Al-Atrash family in the region. Sultan al-Astrash’s daughter, Muntaha al-Atrash, took an early stand against Ba’athist tyranny. In 1991, she publicly tore up a photo of Hafez al-Assad to denounce his involvement with the Coalition in the Iraq war. Saved from prison by her father’s reputation, she joined the Sawaseya Human Rights Organization, becoming its spokeswoman in 2010. At the start of the revolution, she visited rebel areas and publicly called on the Syrian people to join the revolution, before receiving death threats serious enough to convince her to stop appearing in public.

Her daughter Naila al-Atrash, a university drama teacher with close ties to the Syrian Communist Party, was regularly threatened by the regime for her activities, which were deemed subversive. Dismissed in 2001, placed under house arrest in 2008, she took part in the beginning of the 2011 revolt by organizing support groups for people displaced and affected by the conflict, before leaving Syria in 2012. To this day, Naila remains an active supporter of the liberation of Syrians.

Muntaha al-Atrash

Naila al-Atrash

Finally, since the assassination of Waheed al-Balous in September 2015, the resistance and revolt against the Assad regime has continued to take shape. It has taken the form of an armed resistance embodied by several popular militias, as mentioned above, but has also largely developed in civil society, with the multiplication of demonstrations and actions that have increased in intensity and regularity since 2020, also as a consequence of the explosion in prices and the cost of living.

To reread in detail the unfolding of these revolts, read our first article published in October 2023:In Southern Syria, the uprising of Dignity has begun”.

It is also necessary to know more about the structure of Druze society to understand that the population is not necessarily subservient to the decisions of a political or spiritual leadership. In Suwayda, religious leadership is embodied by three sheikhs, the “Aql Sheikhs”: Hamoud Al-Henawi, Hikmat Al-Hajari and Youssef Jarboua. The political positions of these three sheikhs are neither identical nor immutable, and their relationship with the Assad regime has varied according to periods and events.

Following the assassination of Waheed al-Balous and the attack on Suwayda by the Islamic State in 2018, the dissensions between the three sheikhs became even more aggravated. Initially neutral or relatively loyal to the Assad regime, they began to become more critical, particularly sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari, who took a clearer stance against the regime and gradually established himself as the charismatic leader of the community.

Hikmat al-Hajari

Hamoud al-Henawi

Youssef Jarboua

Editor’s note: The positions taken by the spiritual leadership are not binding on the Druze community, which is predominantly secular and does not follow its commandments as may be the case for other religious communities that accept that religion dictates social and political life. Regularly, Druze sheikhs have publicly declared that they support and follow the community’s choices. More recently, Hikmat al-Hajjari’s cautious yet firm stance on Ahmed al-Sharaa’s transitional government, and in particular on the disarmament of factions, has been much criticized by many people, often ignorant of or hostile to the ways of the Druze community, or even hostile to the Druze in general, out of nationalism or religious zeal. Within the community, his positions are also criticized by supporters of factional disarmament, who see it as the main cause of violence within society and seem to trust (a little too much) in the new Islamist central power not to (re)become a threat to the Druze minority…

The Druze, Israel and the Islamists

 

This last chapter is essential in view of recent events concerning the Druze communities in Syria and Palestine, and the controversies and rumors that have accompanied them. The two most persistent misconceptions concern the Druze’s supposed loyalty to the Assad regime on the one hand, and their supposed sympathy for Israel on the other. If we have invalidated the first theory in the preceding chapters, it seems to us that we need to add some more recent information than that concerning Kamal Jumblatt’s time to invalidate the second as well.

It should first be pointed out that the Druze communities of Palestine (Mount Carmel and Galilee) were integrated by the Israeli colony in 1948, in the wake of the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians (Nakba). As such, the Palestinian Druze have Israeli citizenship and are subject to compulsory military conscription. Many of them have now accepted this assimilation to the point of supporting the Zionist project and its genocidal policy towards other Palestinians. Their spiritual leader Muafak Tarif is a perfect example of integrationism, cultivating a friendly relationship with the colonial administration and its representatives. He is also quite close to Benyamin Netanyahu.

Muafak Tarif et Benyamin Netanyahu

Location of Druze communities in the Levant

The other Druze community colonized by Israel is that of the Golan Heights, occupied during the Six-Day War in 1967 and officially annexed in 1981. Of the 130,000 Syrians living in the Golan before the invasion, only 25,000 Druze now live on the plateau, in five communes: Majdal Shams, Buq’ata, Mas’ade, Ein Kenya and al-Gager. However, the Druze of the Golan have never accepted assimilation, and almost 80% of them still refuse to take Israeli citizenship.

Israeli leaders persist in trying to win the sympathy of the Golan Druze and never miss an opportunity to claim that they support Zionism, but reality contradicts the propaganda. When, on July 27, 2024, Hezbollah fired a rocket at a soccer field in Majdal Shams, killing 12 children from the community, the opportunistic visits of Benyamin Netanyahu and Bezamel Smotrich to the site and to the funeral were refused by the residents, who booed and branded them murderers.

Finally, when in December 2024 the Israeli army crossed the 1967 border and invaded the Druze villages of Mount Hermon (Jabal al-Sheikh), Zionist as well as anti-Zionist (and campist) propaganda shared the same false information claiming that the residents of Hadar village were in favor of their annexation by Israel. This rumor was initiated by Nidal Hamade, a pro-Hezbollah Lebanese propagandist exiled in France, who posted on his X account a decontextualized video showing a Druze man declaring that he wanted Hadar annexed.

Yet on the same day, representatives of Hadar’s Druze community published a video containing a statement affirming their refusal to be occupied by Israel and denying the false accusations against the Druze.

Unfortunately, rumors often spread more widely than their denials…

Hadar residents’ statement, December 13, 2024, Al-Araby TV

For both sides, perpetuating this lie is useful: where Israel has an interest in legitimizing the occupation of Syria’s Arab lands by claiming that its inhabitants want it, the pro-Iranian camp has a clear advantage in keeping alive the myth that Syria’s minorities needed Assad and Hezbollah to protect them from Islamists, otherwise they would turn to Israel. This binarity of analysis feeds on the same campist and feudal logic of thought: “If you don’t place yourself under my protection, then you deserve to be oppressed by my enemy”. And for both sides, the Islamist scarecrow is used to justify the subjugation of civilian populations, insecurity and fear of barbarism (terror) being the colonial powers’ main resources for legitimizing their violations of the conventions and laws of war.

Assad, for his part, has never ceased to present himself as the protector of minorities, using Islamists as pawns to, on the one hand, disrupt the popular revolt against his regime, and, on the other, inflict terror among minorities when and where he needed to in support of his prophecy: “It’s either me, or chaos”. In the weeks leading up to the Islamic State’s bloody attack on Suwayda in July 2018 (258 dead and 36 hostages), Assad ostentatiously withdrew all his troops from the region. Then, after the attack, when the population criticized him for not having intervened immediately to block the road to the Islamic State, he responded that it was the fault of the Druze who refused to send their young men into the army. But worst of all, the Islamic State fighters had been transported by bus from Yarmouk (a Palestinian camp on the outskirts of Damascus) to the Suwayda desert a month before the attack as part of a surrender agreement. And, as if that weren’t enough, in November of the same year, a new agreement was signed with the Islamic State resistance pocket in the Yarmouk basin (on the border with Jordan and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights) for a new humanitarian evacuation to the desert in exchange for the release of the Druze hostages taken by the Islamic State after their attack on Suwayda. It should be noted that these two agreements between the regime and the EI were organized under the patronage of the Russians, who had at the same time made a commitment to Israel to keep any threat from Islamists, including Hezbollah, away from its border.

We discuss the attack on Suwayda by the Islamic State in more detail in our first article published in October 2023: “In Southern Syria, the uprising of Dignity has begun

And to conclude: As Islamists have often been the useful idiots of imperialism on all sides, it should come as no surprise that the Druze of Suwayda are in no hurry to hand over their weapons to the new power in Damascus, since Ahmad al-Sharaa has been the representative of the two Islamist movements, DAESH and Jabhat Al-Nosra, which have violently attacked the Druze over the past decade. And that certainly doesn’t make them Israel’s allies, whatever supporters of Iran and Israel may think.

It’s not complicated: A note to help you understand Syria

In the age of social media and information for all and by all, it’s more than ever necessary to build up a reliable list of resources on the subjects you want to analyze and understand. Particularly when it comes to international geopolitics.

This note was prepared by “Interstices-Fajawat“. As an initiative connected to Syrian society, we have put together this note to share our sources of information on Syria. We do not claim that these sources are all impartial or neutral, as we believe that neutrality is often synonymous with blindness or complicity. We ourselves have our own bias regarding our beliefs in revolution and internationalism from below.

Wherever possible, we have indicated the biases and partialities we have identified. We have chosen to retain in the list resources whose analysis we do not share, because they are nonetheless well-informed and transmit first-hand information, which just needs to be taken with great care.

TO READ AND FOLLOW US :

📌 𝕏 (ex-Twitter) – https://x.com/IntersticesFaj

WEBSITES

At the top of the list, the first two categories contain most of the sources whose opinions we share, and which we recommend.

News and Analysis Websites :

 

Personnal Blogs (opinions & academic research) :

 

Syrian-led Advocacy & Media NGO Websites :

 

Local or specialized information websites :

 

General news websites :

 

ESSENTIAL FACT CHECKING WEBSITE 

Verify Syria (AR & EN) – based in Turkey, Syrian-led NGO 

https://verify-sy.com/

SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS (ex-Twitter/X & Instagram)

⚠️ Some of these accounts can share sometimes BIASED or ACRITICAL (sectarian, pro-Sharaa/HTS, pro-SDF/PYD, western…) content ⚠️

Local JOURNALISTS  / ANALYSTS / ACTIVISTS :

Matar Ismaeel – @RevoreporterSy
Joseph Daher – @JosephDaher19
Robin Yassin-Kassab – @qunfuz2
Hassan Ridha – @sayed_ridha
Leila Al-Shami – @LeilaShami
Rim Turkmani – @Rim_Turkmani
Mohammad Hassan – @mohammed_nomad
Firas Kontar – @fkontar78
Rami Jarrah – @RamiJarrah
Mazen Hassoun – @HassounMazen
Nedal Al-Amari – @nedalalamari
Ibrahim al-Assil – @IbrahimAlAssil
Qalaat Al Mudiq – @QalaatAlMudiq
Aymenn J Al-Tamimi – @ajaltamimi
Hassan I. Hassan – @hxhassan
Jenan Moussa – @jenanmoussa
Hussam Hammoud – @HussamHamoud
Abd alhade alani – @abdalhadealani
Rami Safadi – @RamiSafadi93
Vlogging Syria – @timtams83
Suhaib Zaino – @suhaib_zaino
Qusay Noor – @QUSAY_NOOR_
“Osama” – @OsamaSHL
“Karim” – @Idlibie
Tawfiq Ghailani – @SyriaNewsMan
Ivan Hassib – @Ivan_Hassib
Karim Franceschi – @karimfranceschi
Evin Cudi – @FreedomKurds
ScharoMaroof – @ScharoMaroof

FOREIGN JOURNALISTS/ANALYSTS :

Cédric Labrousse – @CdricLabrousse
Thomas Van Linge – @ThomasVLinge
Charles Lister – @Charles_Lister
Wladimir van Wilgenburg – @vvanwilgenburg
CJ Werleman – @cjwerleman
C4H10FO2P – @markito0171

MEDIA & SYRIAN NGOs :

ACT for the Disappeared – @actforthedisappearedlb
Action For Sama – @actionforsama
Al Swaida Al Thawra – @alswaidaalthawrah
Aljumhuriya – @aljumhuriya_net
Association Of Detainees & The Missing in Sednaya Prison – @sednayamissing
Based Syria – @based_syria
Caesar Families Association – @caesarfamilies
Daraj Media English – @darajmediaenglish
Dawlaty – @dawlatysy
Don’t Suffocate the Truth – @donotsuffocatetruth
Eye On Syria – @eyeonsyriaeng
Families For Freedom – @families4freedomsyria
Free Syria’s Disapeared – @freesyriasdisappeared
From the Periphery Media – @fromtheperipherymedia
Half of Syria – @halfofsyria
Horan Free League – @horanfreemedia1
Jadaliya – @jadaliyya
Jusoor for Studies – @jusooren
La Cantine Syrienne de Montreuil – @lacantinesyriennedemontreuil
Live Updates Syria – @liveupdatesfromsyria
Madaniya Network – @madaniyanetwork
Megaphone News – @megaphonenews
Middle East Eye – @middleeasteye
Middle East Institute – @middleeastinst
Middle East Matters – @middleeastmatters
Raseef 22 – @raseef22en
Release Me – @release_me0
Revoleft Syria – @revoleftsyria
Rojava Information Center – @rojavaic
Scholars for Syria – @scholars4syria
SOAS Syria Society – @soassyriasoc
Street Archives Syria – @streetarchivessyria

Syria Civil Defense – @syriacivildefence
Syria Mobilization Hub – @thesyriahub
Syria Pixel – @syria_pixel
Syria TV – @syr_television
Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression – @scmsyriancenter
Syrian Emergency Task Force – @syrianetf / @ualr_setf
Syrian Eyes – @syrianeyesteam
Syrian Feminist Lobby – @syrianfeministlobby
Syrian Hub Official – @syrianhubofficial
Syrian Network for Human Rights – @snhr
Syrian Print Archive – @syrianprintarchive_
Syrian Revolution Archive – @syrian_revolution_archive
Syrian Revolution Story – @syrian.revolution.story
Syrian Road to Justice – @road2justicesy
Syrian Solidarity Campaign – @syria_solidarity_campaign
Syrian Spot – @syrianspot
Syrian Women For Democracy – @cswdsyr
Syrians for Palestine – @syrians4palestine
Syrians For Truth & Justice – @syrians_for_truth_and_justice
Ta’afi Syria – @taafi.syria
Tastakel Organization – @tastakel
The Fire These Times – @firethesetimes
The New Arab – @thenewarab
The Syria Campaign – @thesyriacampaign
The White Helmets – @the_whitehelmets
Verify Syria – @verify.sy
Vive Levantine – @vivelevantine
Wanabqa – @wanabqa
Yarmouk Camp – @yarmouk.camp

BOOKS

👷🏽‍♀️🔧 🚧 – work in progress, please help us by sharing with us books about Syria written by progressive Syrians –

DOCUMENTARIES (with our rating ⭐️⭐️⭐️)

We find it unfortunate that most of these testimonies are inaccessible to the general public and restricted to discretionary festivals where only the intellectual elites and concerned people can see them, while the Humans in question suffer and die most often in the shadows. We respect copyright, but would nevertheless like to acquire all these films, so if you know how to download or buy them, please don’t hesitate to contact us:

collective@interstices-fajawat.org

1974 – EVERYDAY LIFE IN A SYRIAN VILLAGE by Omar Amiralay ⭐️⭐️⭐️

The first documentary to present an unabashed critique of the impact of the Syrian government’s agricultural and land reforms, Everyday Life in a Syrian Village delivers a powerful jab at the state’s conceit of redressing social and economic inequities.

2003 – A FLOOD IN BAATH COUNTRY by Omar Amiralay ⭐️⭐️⭐️

The movie examines the flood’s devastating impact on a Syrian village. With its powerful and daring critique of Syria’s political regime and the tribal politics that hold it together, the film foreshadows the wave of democracy currently sweeping the Arab world, with citizens finally rising up to demand a fundamental change in their countries’ leadership.

2013 – RETURN TO HOMS by Talal Derki ⭐️⭐️⭐️

A look behind the barricades of the besieged city of Homs, where for nineteen-year-old Basset and his ragtag group of comrades, the audacious hope of revolution is crumbling like the buildings around them.

2014 – SYRIA : CHILDREN ON THE FRONTLINES by Marcel Mettelsiefen & Anthony Wonke ⭐️⭐️

The story of five young children whose lives have been changed forever by the civil war in Syria.

2014 – THE LAST ASSIGNMENT by Rashed Radwan ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

On November 20, 2013, Iraqi freelance cameraman Yasser Faisal al-Jumaili crossed the Turkish border into Syria with his trusted Syrian fixer Jomah Alqasem. The Syrian war had been raging for two-and-a-half years and now saw the various rebel groups splitting one from another, mostly around ideological differences. The assignment was to access the groups and build a picture of who these men were, away from rhetoric, both on and off duty on the frontlines. For 13 days in Syria, the two reporters filmed the men behind the frontlines: fighters with the Free Syrian Army, Al-Tawhid Brigade, Al-Nusra Front, Ahrar Al-Sham, and even ISIL.

2014 – HAUNTED by Liwaa Yazji 

When the bomb comes the first thing we do is to run away, later we remember and think of everything we left behind. We did not bid farewell to our homes, memories, photos, identities and life that passed. It is about how homes haunt the life of the souls that were living in them, as much as they themselves haunt the houses.

2014 – OUR TERRIBLE COUNTRY by Mohammad Ali Atassi & Ziad Homsi ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

How to make a film on violence without directly showing or reproducing it? The film Our terrible country attempts to respond to this approach by taking us on the perilous journey of Yassin Haj Saleh, a well-known Syrian intellectual and dissident, and young photographer Ziad Homsi who travel together in an arduous, dangerous route from the liberated area of Douma, Damascus to Raqqa in northern Syria, only to find themselves eventually forced to leave their home country for a temporary exile.

2014 – SILVERED WATER, SYRIA SELF PORTRAIT by Wiam Bedirxan & Ossama Mohammed ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

A look at first-hand video accounts of violence in modern-day Syria as filmed by activists in the besieged city of Homs.

2014 – THE CAVE by Feras Fayyad

Deep beneath the surface in the Syrian province of Ghouta, a group of female doctors have established an underground field hospital. Under the supervision of paediatrician Dr. Amani and her staff of doctors and nurses, hope is restored for some of the thousands of children and civilian victims of the ruthless Syrian civil war.

2014 – LETTERS FROM YARMOUK by Rashid Masharawi ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Messages captured at the Yarmouk refugee camp in moments of extreme complexity; messages siding with life in the face of death; moments of love in a time of war and questions of homeland and exile.

2015 – SALAM NEIGHBOUR by Zach Ingrasci & Chris Temple

Two filmmakers fully embed themselves in a Syrian refugee camp, providing an intimate look at the world’s most dire humanitarian crisis.

2015 – 7 DAYS IN SYRIA by Janine Di Giovanni & Robert Rippberger ⭐️⭐️⭐️

In the most dangerous country in the world for journalists, Newsweek Middle East editor, Janine di Giovanni, risks it all to bear witness, ensuring that the world knows about the suffering of the Syrian people.

2015 – A SYRIAN LOVE STORY by Sean McAllister ⭐️⭐️

Filmed over 5 years, A Syrian Love Story charts an incredible odyssey to political freedom. For Raghda and Amer, it is a journey of hope, dreams and despair: for the revolution, their homeland and each other.

2016 – THE WAR SHOW by Andreas Dalsgaard & Obaidah Zytoon ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

A Syrian radio DJ shares her experiences in the aftermath of the 2011 Arab Spring.

2016 – HOUSES WITHOUT DOORS by Avo Kaprealian

Aleppo-Armenian filmmaker Avo Kaprealian shows the life of an Armenian family that has fled to Beirut during clashes in the New Village district of Aleppo, Syria, in 2015. Kaprealian documented the destruction in the district and the civilians who faced hardships. He managed to shoot footage from the balcony of his house […]

2016 – BORN IN SYRIA by Hernán Zin

Since civil war started in Syria in 2011, an estimated 9 million Syrians have fled their homes, half of them children. These children have fled unimaginable horror: the indiscriminate bombings of Bachar Al Assad’s government, and ISIS’ raping and beheading, only to find themselves trapped in makeshift camps or closed borders. We witness the journey of these refugees to the promised land of Europe.

2016 – THE WHITE HELMETS by Orlando von Einsiedel ⭐️⭐️

As daily airstrikes pound civilian targets in Syria, a group of indomitable first responders risk their lives to rescue victims from the rubble.

2016 – TADMOR / PALMYRA by Monika Borgmann & Lokman Slim ⭐️⭐️

Amidst the popular uprising in Syria that began in 2011, a group of former Lebanese detainees of the Assad regime decides to break their long-held silence about the horrific years they spent imprisoned in Tadmor, Palmyra, one of the Syrian government’s most dreaded prisons.

2017 – LAST MEN IN ALEPPO by Feras Fayyad ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Volunteers Khaled, Mahmoud, and Subhi rush toward bomb sites while others run away. They search through collapsed buildings for the living and dead. Contending with fatigue, dwindling ranks, and concerns for their families’ safety, they must decide whether to stay or to flee a city in ruins.

2017 – CRIES FROM SYRIA by Evgeny Afineevsky ⭐️⭐️⭐️

An attempt to re-contextualize the European migrant crisis and ongoing hostilities in Syria, through eyewitness and participant testimony. Children and parents recount the revolution, civil war, air strikes, atrocities and ongoing humanitarian aid crises, in a portrait of recent history and the consequences of violence.

2017 – CITY OF GHOSTS by Matthew Heineman ⭐️⭐️⭐️

The anonymous activists who exposed ISIS atrocities in Raqqa. Follows their undercover operations, exile, and risks taken to reveal the ruthless realities under ISIS rule. The story of “Raqqa is Being Slaughtered Silently”:

https://www.raqqa-sl.com/en/

2017 – OF FATHERS AND SONS by Talal Derki ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Talal Derki returns to his homeland where he gains the trust of a radical Islamist family, sharing their daily life for over two years. His camera focuses on Osama and his younger brother Ayman, providing an extremely rare insight into what it means to grow up in an Islamic Caliphate.

2017 – HELL ON EARTH: THE FALL OF SYRIA AND THE RISE OF ISIS by Sebastian Junger & Nick Quested

A look at the current state of Syria amidst war and chaos in 2017, featuring stories of survival and observations by political experts from around the world.

2018 – THIS IS HOME by Alexandra Shiva

The lives of four Syrian families, resettled in Baltimore and under a deadline to become self-sufficient in eight months.

2019 – FOR SAMA by Waad al-Kateab and Edward Watts ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

In a time of conflict and darkness in her home in Aleppo, Syria, one young woman kept her camera rolling — while falling in love, getting married, having a baby and saying goodbye as her city crumbled. The story before “Action For Sama”:

https://www.actionforsama.com/

2020 – AYOUNI by Yasmin Fedda

Noura and Machi search for answers about their loved ones – Bassel Safadi and Paolo Dall’Oglio, who are among the over 100,000 forcibly disappeared in Syria.

2021 – OUR MEMORY BELONGS TO US by Rami Farah ⭐️⭐️

Three Syrian activists are reunited on a theatre stage in Paris. 10 years after the revolution, they revisit traumas and memories of a ferocious war.

2021 – LITTLE PALESTINE: MEMORY OF A SIEGE by Abdallah Al-Khatib ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

After the Syrian Revolution, Al-Assad’s regime besieges the district of Yarmouk, largest Palestinian refugee camp in the world. Yarmouk is cut off. The director records the daily deprivations while celebrating the people’s courage.

2022 – THE LOST SOULS OF SYRIA by Garance Le Caisne & Stéphane Malterre ⭐️⭐️

In 2013, a Syrian official flees with 27,000 photos of corpses tortured to death in the country’s prisons since 2011. One year later, the photos of the Caesar Report reveal to the world the horror of the crimes of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime.

2023 – UNDER THE SKY OF DAMASCUS by Talal Derki

In Damascus, a collective of young female actors comes together to research the topic. They plan to use the moving anonymous statements of countless women to create a stage play that will break taboos.

2024 – MY MEMORY IS FULL OF GHOSTS by Anas Zawahri

Like a visual elegy, My Memory Is Full of Ghosts explores a reality caught between past, present and future in Homs, Syria. Behind the self-portrait of an exsanguinated population in search of normality, emerge memories of the city, haunted by destruction, disfigurement and loss. A deeply moving film, a painful echo of the absurdity of war and the strength of human beings.